2007 Legislative Agenda

By Richard Land and Barrett Duke - Apr 10, 2007 - comment

The change in majority control of the House and Senate brings additional challenges to our efforts to continue to advance pro-life, family friendly legislation. Nevertheless, we are committed to this crucial goal. While the majorities have changed, there are still many men and women in Congress who share our concerns for the decline of our culture. We will continue to work with them on a wide range of issues. In addition, we will step up our efforts to educate Congress about the importance of the bills we are supporting, and we will continue to educate and mobilize the American public in order to make sure the grassroots are involved in the great issues of our day.

Below are a number of the bills and issues we are engaging in 2007. A number of these bills already have bipartisan support. We are looking forward to advancing them quickly. Other bills and issues will require much greater effort, but we consider all of them to be of paramount concern and will work tirelessly on them.

Sanctity Of Human Life

Support

  • The Pregnant Women Support Act—This bill will provide better education, health care, and support for pregnant women that will make it easier for them to keep their unborn babies. This is different from the Ryan bill, H.R. 1074, which is unacceptable due to its inclusion of harm reduction provisions.
  • Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act, H.R. 1063—This bill would prohibit transportation of a minor girl across state lines for an abortion to circumvent parental notification or parental consent laws in the girl’s home state. It also would require an abortion provider in a state without a parental notification requirement to notify a parent before performing an abortion on a minor girl from another state.
  • Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, S. 356—This bill would require abortion providers to notify a woman who is seeking an abortion 20 weeks after fertilization of the growing medical evidence that the unborn child in her womb can feel severe and extreme pain during an abortion procedure. If the woman continues with the abortion procedure after being given this information, she would be offered anesthesia for the unborn child in order to lessen the pain that would be experienced by the unborn child.
  • Alternative Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies Enhancement Act, H.R. 322—This bill will fund research on alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells that do not involve destruction of embryos.
  • RU-486 Suspension and Review Act (Holly’s Law), H.R. 63—This bill would withdraw the abortifacient RU-486 from the market while the U.S. comptroller general reviews the process by which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration rushed the drug to the market in 2000.
  • Human Cloning ban—Bills that will prohibit the cloning of human beings.

Oppose

  • Embryo-destructive stem cell research—Bills that would expand the president’s ban on embryo-destructive research beyond the lines he originally approved.
  • Harm reduction—Bills that reverse or confuse the ABC approach to reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and STD’s.

Religious Freedom

Support

  • The Workplace Religious Freedom Act—This bill will restore some of the rights of religious people in the workplace that have been eroded in recent years. It provides guidelines for businesses to help them understand the extent to which they are expected to accommodate the religious practice of employees and conscience protections.
  • The Public Expressions of Religion Act, S. 415, HR. 725—This bill will prevent plaintiffs from collecting court fees from defendants in religious expression cases.
  • The Pledge Protection Act, H.R. 699—This bill would bar certain courts from ruling on the phrase “under God” in the pledge and invokes Congress’ constitutional right to define the jurisdiction of the lower courts.
  • The 108th Congress Version of The Houses of Worship Free Speech Act—This bill will eliminate the gag rule on political engagement by churches. The flawed version introduced in the 109th Congress is not acceptable due to the addition of Section 3.

Homosexuality

Support

The Marriage Protection Amendment—This bill will define marriage as between one man and one woman and prevent marriage benefits for civil unions.

Oppose

Special benefits for homosexuals—Legislation that provides partner benefits, hate crimes status, or other special protections for homosexuals/homosexual couples.

Health

Support

FDA regulation of tobacco—This bill will give the FDA regulatory authority over tobacco in the same way it has oversight of other consumables. It also would provide guidelines on labeling to circumvent tobacco efforts to hide the health warnings they must place on their packaging.

Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act, H.R. 493, S. 358—This bill would prohibit health insurers and employers from discriminating against people on the basis of genetic information, though prenatal children are not covered under the current language of the bill.

Judges

We will continue to encourage the swift nomination and confirmation of strict-constructionist judges at all levels of the federal judiciary.

Immigration

We will continue to promote a balanced immigration policy that secures the borders, addresses illegal hiring practices of employers, and deals realistically with the 10-12 million illegal aliens in the country.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Christian Citizenship, Legislation, National

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com