Americans now safer with Act on national security

By Doug Carlson - Jul 15, 2008 - 1

Score one for the American people and the telecommunications companies that partnered with the government to help thwart attacks on our homeland following the horrific events of September 11, 2001.

After a year of political wrangling, Congress agreed to a sweeping overhaul of an intelligence-gathering law to help protect Americans from future attacks on U.S. soil and to grant retroactive immunity to telecom companies that admirably cooperated with the government in monitoring phone calls with terrorist networks. The break in the political deadlock July 9 came just weeks before critical authorizations to monitor terrorist communications were set to expire.

A hearty applause is fitting for all those who encouraged their congressman and senators to support the bill.

The update to the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) enables our intelligence agencies to track communications placed into or out of the United States with known or suspected terrorists. This intelligence-gathering authorization, signed into law by President Bush one day after the smoke cleared on Capitol Hill, peels back much of the red tape in monitoring terrorist networks. It requires, for example, that the special FISA court approve warrants for programs in general to intercept communications rather than individual communications. Equally important, it sends a strong message that the U.S. government will reward, not reprimand, companies that assist the government in its efforts to identify terrorist suspects.

What had held up the modification of the law was refusal by a handful of senators to protect telecom companies—the very groups that helped to protect all Americans—from roughly 40 lawsuits totaling in the billions of dollars slapped upon them for their patriotic service. Mounting grassroots pressure, along with a compromise provision to require more judicial and congressional oversight, led to inclusion of these protections in the bill passed by a more than 2-to-1 margin in both the House and Senate.

The only real losers amid this victory are trial lawyers wishing to line their pockets and Islamic extremists who pursue our destruction and relish in merciless killings in the name of their god, Allah.

In these unsettled times, our intelligence agencies must not be hamstrung from using technological tools to preserve our liberty and promote its acceptance abroad. The enemy we face today is unlike our foes in wars of generations past. Ours is an enemy that knows no rules and has no regard for human life. Guided by a radical interpretation of Islam, these extremists consider the slaying of those who do not submit to their religion as not only acceptable political practice but also dutiful religious service.

To meet this force with anything less than the greatest possible resistance would be an empty honorarium to those who have sacrificed before us to make us free. Many in Washington, gratefully, seem to see it that way, too.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to monitor issues of public policy in America, such as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). If you would like to help us continue our efforts, please click here.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Legislation, National, Issues,

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Jul 15th, 2008, at 1:47pm, Manny Tomes wrote:

In the time-honored words of Benjamin Franklin, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” But by all means let’s protect the big corporations. I’m sure there is some biblical justification for that.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com