America’s own genocide
- Feb 18, 2009 - 1
In 1994, scores of people were sadistically slaughtered in the African country of Rwanda when the ruling Hutu tribe attempted to wipe out the country’s Tutsi minority.
In 100 days, nearly 1million people were brutally murdered. The horrific genocide was compounded when the whole world stood silently by and did nothing to intervene.
“Hotel Rwanda,” a film released in 2005, is based on one man’s attempt to rescue as many people as possible from the Hutu’s murderous rampage. At great risk, hotel manager Paul Rusesabagina managed to save more than 1,200 Rwandans from certain death.
Early in the movie, a television journalist named Jack videotapes footage of the brutal genocide being inflicted upon the Tutsis.
When Jack shows the video to Rusesabagina, the hotel manager is relieved. He is sure that once the images are televised abroad, the West will move to stop the murderous madness in Rwanda.
The cynical journalist is not nearly as hopeful as Rusesabagina.”If people see this footage,” Jack snarls, “they’ll say, ‘… [T]hat’s terrible,’ and they’ll go on eating their dinners.”
His words prove to be prophetic. For 100 days the carnage continued unchecked by Western intervention. How could the United States remain silent while such senseless brutality took place? The answer: The same way many have stood by and done nothing while millions of babies have been aborted in America.
On Jan. 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that abortion was a right protected by the Constitution. As a result, the body count of babies now stands at more than 50 million. And many Americans still choose, as the world did during the Rwandan genocide, to look the other way.
Attitudes concerning abortion are changing in America. Polls consistently show a majority disapprove of unfettered abortion on demand. However, while many believe abortion is a terrible wrong, they still “go on eating their dinners.”
Pre-born babies are murdered every day in America. Some are poisoned with saline solution and others literally are torn apart. And yet many Americans “go on eating their dinners.”
Some are able to look the other way because they believe abortion only occurs in the direst of circumstances. However, statistics reveal that at least 94 percent of all abortions are performed as a matter of convenience.
Abortion as a convenience has given rise to a new procedure known as “fetal reduction.” In this operation – which is utilized when a woman is pregnant with more than one child – the abortionist takes the life of one – or more – of the pre-born babies, leaving the woman to deliver the child she chooses to keep.
Many Americans were introduced to the procedure of “fetal reduction” the summer of 2005 when Amy Richards wrote a column for The New York Times Magazine detailing her decision to abort two of the triplets she had been carrying.
The reason Richards gave for taking the life of two of her unborn children was simple. “I cannot have triplets,” she wrote. “I was not married; I lived in a five-story walk-up in the East Village.”
So Richards asked the doctor: “Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?”
In America it has come to the point that a young woman can “get rid” of two of her unborn children and keep one, all because she does not want to be inconvenienced. Further, she can feel free to casually discuss her decision in a prestigious magazine.
“That’s terrible,” many will say, and then go on eating their dinners.
The senseless slaughter of nearly 1 million people recounted in “Hotel Rwanda” is sobering. The silence of the West, particularly in the U.S., is troubling. However, even more disturbing are the 50 million-plus babies who have been aborted in America since 1973.
The Rwandan genocide is now history, but the slaughter of pre-born babies in the United States continues. And as long as Americans mutter, “That’s terrible,” and go on eating their dinners, it will continue unabated.
This article is reprinted from the January 22, 2009, issue of the Baptist Message, the newsjournal of the Louisiana Baptist Convention.
Further Learning
Learn more about: Life, Abortion
Comments are closed. Please use our contact form if you have any thoughts or questions.
comments
1 On Feb 18th, 2009, at 10:44am, James E Reeves wrote:
I read this article today on Google News -
VATICAN CITY (AFP) — Pope Benedict XVI on Wednesday told visiting US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Roman Catholic, that all Catholics should uphold the Church’s teachings on life.
Benedict “took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church’s consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death,” the Vatican said in a statement.
Your brother,
James