Battle over same-sex ‘marriage’ continues in states

By Tom Strode - Apr 15, 2005 - comment

The states continue to form the battleground over homosexual “marriage.”

Among recent developments on the issue, according to Baptist Press:

  • The Oregon Supreme Court invalidated in a unanimous decision April 14 the marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples last year in Multnomah County, the state’s most populous county. The court ruled the licenses violated Oregon law and refused a request to legalize civil unions, which provide homosexual couples with most of the benefits of marriage.
  • Connecticut enacted a law legalizing civil unions for same-sex couples. When Gov. Jodi Rell, R., signed the bill into law April 20, Connecticut joined Vermont as the only states to endorse civil unions. The law, however, defines marriage as between a man and a woman.
  • Kansas voters approved by a 70-30 percent margin April 5 a state constitutional amendment restricting marriage to a man and a woman. It became the 18^th^ state in 18 tries to pass a marriage amendment. The Kansas version prohibits both same-sex “marriage” and civil unions.
  • A California appeals court ruled April 4 the state’s domestic partnership law does not violate Proposition 22, the 2000 voter-approved prohibition on homosexual “marriage.” Domestic partnerships, which are similar to civil unions, provide same-sex couples with nearly the same benefits as marriage. The court decided, however, the legislature cannot legalize homosexual “marriage” without permitting voters to decide the issue.

Most pro-family organizations, including the ERLC, are seeking to build support for a federal amendment that will define marriage as a union of only a man and a woman.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com