Bible textbook reaffirmed, supported as part of state-adopted textbook list

By Jennifer Davis Rash - Nov 27, 2007 - comment

The Bible textbook that made history in Alabama and caused a media frenzy all in the same week remains the only book of its kind on the state-adopted textbooks list.

Approved by the Alabama State Board of Education Oct. 11 as one of 2,500 books on the list, “The Bible and Its Influence” will stay, said State Department of Education Superintendent Joe Morton. And with that decision, it becomes the first Bible textbook to ever be placed on the list, which means a local school system can use state funding to purchase the textbook if that system chooses to use it.

“I did not know it was on the list. I don’t think any board member knew it was on the list but [the list] passed unanimously,” Morton said Oct. 25 during a discussion on the book with the eight-member board of education.

The discussion, which took place during an already-scheduled work session, came after some board of education members expressed concern about the book.

The book has a history of controversy in Alabama, making its first appearance in the 2005 legislative session. It became the focus of legislation designed to mandate its use as the official textbook for Bible courses in the state. With that move, several Christian groups, including Alabama Citizens Action Program (ALCAP) and Eagle Forum, took a strong interest in the book. The first edition of the book was strongly rejected by these groups and changes were made by the publisher.

While concerns still exist over some content in the book, the legislation was defeated mainly because it would have mandated the use of only this textbook.

Dan Ireland, executive director of ALCAP, said textbooks should be approved by the board of education, not the Legislature.

An official from the Bible Literacy Project, the company that developed “The Bible and Its Influence,” said it heard this request and submitted the second edition to the board of education for review.

But with its controversial history, some board members contend they should have been alerted to its placement on the list. An official in the office of classroom improvements, textbooks said no one on the review committee flagged the book or indicated any concern about the book. So when the board asked if there were any books of concern, a no answer was given.

“It should remain as is,” Morton said, noting that proper procedures were followed. But he did offer a way for other Bible textbook publishers to try for the list.

January 2007 was the original submission period for the literature category, which is where the Bible textbook falls, but Morton suggested opening the category up again for the January 2008 period.

This would allow other publishers of Bible textbooks not to have to wait for the cycle to repeat in six years, he explained. Morton also emphasized any book publisher wanting to be considered for the literature category would be welcome to be reviewed.

This article is reprinted from the November 1, 2007, issue of The Alabama Baptist, the newspaper of the Alabama Baptist State Convention.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Education

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com