Bill targets sale of adult video games

By Tom Strode - May 8, 2008 - comment

Congressmen from both political parties have partnered to sponsor legislation designed to prevent children from purchasing or renting adult video games.

Reps. Jim Matheson, D.-Utah, and Lee Terry, R.-Neb., announced May 7 the introduction of the Video Game Ratings Enforcement Act, H.R. 5990. The bill would require retailers to check the identification of customers seeking to buy or rent games rated M for “mature” or AO for “adult only.” Games rated M have content that may be suitable only for those at least 17 years old, while AO games include material that is appropriate only for those 18 or older, according to an industry ratings board.

The measure does not bar parents from renting or purchasing M- or AO-rated games for their children, but it mandates stores display explanations of the rating system to help parents in purchasing or renting video games. Retail violators could receive a civil penalty of as much as $5,000.

The congressional action came at the close of a record-setting sales week for a controversial new game, “Grand Theft Auto IV.” The game, which was released April 29, broke all-time sales records for a first week and first day. Worldwide sales for the first week were six million copies at a retail value of more than $500 million, according to FOX Business. The game’s opening day was 3.6 million copies sold for a value of about $310 million, FOX reported.

“Grand Theft Auto IV,” which is rated M, has received heavy criticism from pro-family and other organizations. The graphic and realistic game enables the video gamer, playing the role of the main character, to kill policemen and gang members, have sex with prostitutes, visit strip clubs, steal cars, get drunk and run over pedestrians.

The “Grand Theft Auto” franchise may be the most popular video game series for young teenage boys. “If you let your child play this game, you’re a bad parent,” said one of the game’s writers, Lazlow Jones, according to The Washington Post,

“Games like ‘Grand Theft Auto IV’ appeal to the lowest common denominator …,” said Parents Television Council President Tim Winter in commending Matheson and Terry. “Video game ratings supposedly exist to protect children from material that is created for adults, but there is no consequence for irresponsible retailers who repeatedly sell these games to children.”

Matheson said in a written release he knows he, as a parent, is “the first line of defense against my kids playing Mature-rated video games. But parents can’t be everywhere monitoring everything and some reasonable, common sense rules ought to be in place to back parents up.”

A Federal Trade Commission study in 2005 showed 42 percent of unsupervised 13 to 16 year olds were able to buy M-rated games at stores, according to Matheson’s office.

Video games rated M “may contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content and/or strong language,” according to the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB). Games rated AO “may include prolonged scenes of intense violence and/or graphic sexual content and nudity,” according to the board.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Children, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com