Border security bill might jumpstart stalled immigration debate

By Doug Carlson - Aug 14, 2007 - comment

Having failed to pass comprehensive immigration reform legislation that would deal with the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States, Congress has turned its attention to a border security bill and will resume consideration of the measure in September.

The Senate overwhelmingly approved the $3-billion border enforcement legislation, 89-1, in late July as an amendment to the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act (H.R. 2638), which ultimately passed 89-4.

Although the immigration amendment, the Border Security First Act, would leave unresolved the dilemma over how to handle the majority of illegal immigrants residing in the U.S., many backers of comprehensive immigration reform believe the measure is a good first-step toward a comprehensive plan to the immigration impasse. Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Mark Pryor (D-AR), who offered the amendment, were joined in support by multiple other senators known recently for their outspoken views on a comprehensive solution.

Specifically, the border security bill would:

  • Provide funding for the 700 miles of fencing required under the Secure Fence Act;
  • Provide funding for 300 miles of vehicle barriers;
  • Provide funding for 105 ground-based radar and camera towers;
  • Provide funding for four unmanned aerial vehicles to patrol the U.S.-Mexico border;
  • Provide funding for hiring, training, and placing on duty 23,000 Customs and Border Patrol agents;
  • Provide funding and benchmark dates to improve information gathering on illegal immigrants;
  • Order the collection of biometric data and fingerprints of immigrants entering the U.S. at all entry ports;
  • Increase penalties for fleeing border security, overstaying visas, returning to the U.S. after being deported, and committing crimes while in the U.S.;
  • Ensure resources to end “Catch and Release” and detain up to 45,000 illegal immigrants per day;
  • Create oversight programs to analyze the level of border security and to improve the security in place;
  • Build new ports of entry to better facilitate legal entry after the implementation of the physical border security;
  • Require the deportation of legal or illegal immigrants who participate in criminal gangs; and
  • Give the secretary of Homeland Security discretion to detain illegal immigrants for 90 days prior to deportation, an order that can be renewed an indefinite number of times if the immigrant is deemed to be a threat.

When Congress returns in September, a conference committee will try to reconcile the Senate’s Homeland Security bill with the House-passed version, which does not include the border security provisions. President Bush, who has signaled reservations over some border security provisions, threatened to veto the overall bill because it exceeds his spending request by $2.4 billion.

Addressing security issues, both at the borders and within the country, is a good move to demonstrate to the American people that the government is serious about protecting our homeland and ending the constant flow of unidentified people into the U.S. While the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission has not yet fully examined the details of the bill or offered an endorsement, we believe it includes the principle components needed to move the nation toward comprehensive immigration reform.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Immigration, Legislation, Social Issues

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com