Bush, Kerry differ on partial-birth abortion ruling

By Tom Strode - Jun 15, 2004 - comment

President Bush and Sen. John Kerry, the two parties’ presidential candidates, expressed contrasting viewpoints on the June 1 decision by a federal judge to strike down the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act.

White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan issued this statement on the day of the ruling: “Partial-birth abortion is an abhorrent procedure that must be ended once and for all. The President strongly disagrees with today’s California court ruling, which overturns the overwhelming bipartisan majority in Congress that voted to pass this important legislation. The President is committed to building a culture of life in America and the administration will take every necessary step to defend this law in the courts.”

Meanwhile, Stephanie Cutter, spokeswoman for the John Kerry campaign, released this statement: “John Kerry voted to restrict late-term abortions but only where there was a clear exception for life or health of women. However, George Bush pushed through a different piece of legislation that failed to protect the health of women, and that is what the court struck down today. When John Kerry is president he will appoint judges that are committed to upholding the Constitution, not pursuing an ideological agenda.”

Federal judge Phyllis Hamilton in San Francisco invalidated the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act. She permanently blocked enforcement of the law but applied that injunction only to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates, the city and county of San Francisco, and their representatives.

Opponents of the law also challenged it in federal courts in New York and Lincoln, Neb. The judges in those cases have yet to issue opinions.

Closing arguments in Lincoln occurred June 2, and federal judge Richard Kopf said he expects to issue his opinion Aug. 31, according to the Omaha World-Herald. Federal judge Richard Casey in New York heard final arguments in his court June 22.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com