China emerging as a global leader, attracting United States’ interest in economic, security pa

By Manda Gibson - Jun 26, 2008 - comment

It’s no question that China is becoming more powerful on the international scene.

The main question, then, is how does the United States relate to the massive nation?

For seven consecutive administrations, the United States has held the same policy toward China: to encourage China’s integration into today’s global system. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said, “America has reason to welcome a confident, peaceful, and prosperous China. We want China as a global partner, able and willing to match its growing capabilities to its international responsibilities.”

Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States, China has publicly supported the war on terrorism, including support of military efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The two countries have also worked together on global security issues, like the nuclear programs of North Korea and Iran. China and the United States also have built a strong economic relationship. Total trade between the countries grew from $33 billion in 1992 to more than $386 billion in 2007.

More peaceful now

The United States and China also have cooperated in some aspects of law enforcement, including intellectual property rights enforcement and human smuggling.

But it hasn’t always been this way. Since the communist takeover of China in 1949, the relationship between the United States and China has had its ups and downs. By the 1970s and 1980s the two countries had made progress in their relationship, though, resulting in joint programs and research projects in areas like scientific, technological and cultural exchange and trade relations.

However, the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre — during which hundreds of demonstrators lost their lives — put a halt to advances in the relationship. To show its condemnation of China’s military force at Tiananmen Square, the United States imposed economic sanctions, suspended weapons exports to China, and stopped sanctioning high-level official exchanges between the two countries. As a result, U.S. investors’ interest in China fell significantly.

The relationship continued to suffer until the late 1990s. In 1997, former Chinese president Jiang Zemin visited the United States. It was the first time a Chinese president had made a state visit to the United States since 1985, and several issues were resolved during his stay. The following year, former President Bill Clinton visited China, traveling extensively throughout the country. In 2002, President George W. Bush visited China. Later that year President Jiang Zemin visited with President Bush in Texas. In November 2005, President Bush visited China again, and China’s current president, Hu Jintao, traveled to Washington in 2006.

The relationship is stronger now, but in some areas the United States and China still disagree, such as what should be done about Taiwan’s desire for independence and Hong Kong’s political development. Also, the United States continues to express concern over human rights issues in China.

This article is reprinted from the June 5, 2008, issue of The Alabama Baptist, the newspaper of the Alabama Baptist State Convention.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, National, Social Issues

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com