Chinese leader denies that one-child policy is changing

By staff - Mar 6, 2008 - comment

China has no plans to eliminate its infamous one-child, population-control policy, a top official of the communist regime said March 5.

“We will adhere to the current policy of family planning, keep the birthrate low, improve the health of newborns and adopt a full range of measures to address the gender imbalance in babies,” Premier Wen Jiabao said at the opening of China’s annual parliament meeting, according to the Agence France-Presse news service.

Wen’s assurance that the nearly three-decade-old program would continue repudiated Feb. 28 remarks from Zhao Baige, vice minister of the National Population and Family Planning Commission.

The one-child policy “has become a big issue among decision makers,” she told reporters, according to The Times of London. “We want incrementally to have this change. I cannot answer at what time or how.”

The rebuttal of Zhao’s assertion was no surprise to Steve Mosher, an expert on China’s coercive population control policy.

“These officials are very good at speaking out of both sides of their mouths,” Mosher told Baptist Press. “[Zhao] tried to put the best face possible on the policy. When the foreign press read too much into it, they backed off.”

Beijing instituted its one-child policy in the late 1970s in an effort to slow the birth rate of the world’s most populous country. Penalties for violations of the policy have included fines, arrests and the destruction of homes, as well as forced abortion and sterilization. Infanticide, especially of females, also has been reported. Beijing now forbids physical coercion for abortion or sterilization.

The population-control policy appears to have helped produce a dramatic gender imbalance. Because of a preference for sons by Chinese couples, many have utilized ultrasound technology to choose sex-selection abortions in recent years. China had 120 males born for every 100 females in 2005, the United Nations Population Fund reported in October. The ratio was as high as 130 to 100 in some provinces, according to the report. The normal ratio is about 105 to 100.

Since 1986, the program generally has limited couples in urban areas to one child and those in rural areas to two, if the first is a girl, Mosher told BP. The government revised the policy in 2002 to permit a husband and wife who are both only children to have two offspring, he said.

An increase in the government’s limit to two children would not solve the problem, said Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute. Mosher documented the abuses against women under the one-child policy while living as a social scientist in rural China in 1979-980.

It “would not end the abuses,” he said. “The problem with China’s policy is not that it is a one-child policy or a two-child policy…. The problem is that the government is dictating to couples how many children they will have. That choice should be between a husband and a wife and God, not a husband and a wife and government bureaucrats.”

China is seeking to “minimize the human rights abuses” of its government, which remains a dictatorship, Mosher said. The communist leaders will do what they want, “regardless of what the people think,” he said. “If the people got to vote on this policy, it would have been abandoned 25 years ago.”

Hundreds of thousands of Chinese are resisting the repressive policy, Cybercast News Service (CNS) reported earlier this year. In Hubei, one of China’s 22 provinces, 93,000 people broke the one-child rule in 2007, the province’s family planning commission reported, according to CNS.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Children, Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Persecution

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com