Dr. Richard Land appeared Oct 7, 2008 on CSPAN’s Washington Journal

By Jill Martin - Oct 5, 2007 - 1

CSPAN's Washington Journal

Dr. Land will be appeared on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal Sunday October 7, 2007. He discussed the 2008 election.

Further Learning

Learn more about:

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Oct 7th, 2007, at 7:30am, Jennifer Wise wrote:

I listened to Dr. Land’s viewpoint this morning. When a caller expressed to Dr. Land that abortion should not be ruled out in the case of the life of the mother...he very casually sneered with a remark about how.."Oh,please...that’s only in one percent of all cases...oh,please!!!” Well, for every one million birts, that happens to effect the life or death decision for at least 10,000 women...and we are only talking about their physical life or death...not even speaking of mental health, or cases of rape, incest, or the 20% of all pregnancies that end up in a diabetic phase, and in a certain percentage of those cases..the women stays diabetic.  I don’t think a woman has the right to take a life without due process, but this man doesn’t have the right to take a life without due process either...that’s why he should keep his religious beliefs out of laws that DICTATE the lives of women...a subject he clearly knows little about.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com