Embryo Adoption

By Jerry Price - Jan 9, 2006 - comment

Cara and Gregg Vest wanted to have a baby. But five years of fertility treatments and three attempts at in vitro fertilization (IVF) had proven unsuccessful. Then they heard about Snowflakes, an embryo adoption ministry (http://www.snowflakes.org). Snowflakes put them in touch with Susanne Gray who had successfully undergone in vitro fertilization treatments and had 23 excess frozen embryos. In May 2002, Cara Vest gave birth to Joshua after Gray’s embryos had been implanted. Of course, the program has its detractors. Susan Crockin, an attorney specializing in reproductive law, says, “The problem with this label [adoption] is it elevates embryos to the status of a child in many people’s minds, and then you end up on a slippery slope. If you can adopt embryos, how can you do stem-cell research on them or discard them?” Good question!

While embryo adoption is still “legally murky,” it seems to be gaining favor among couples who have tried IVF without success and some who are looking for a less costly alternative than many of the risky fertility treatments. Dr. Richard Scott of Reproductive Medicine Associates in New Jersey, the nation’s second largest IVF clinic, says, “I’m getting 10 times as many questions about embryo donation than I had even two years ago.” There are an estimated 100,000 frozen embryos presently stored in the United States.

Suzanne Smalley “A New Baby Debate,” http://www.newsweek.com , March 24, 2003 [Access fee required]

“Nightlight has matched 230 genetic families (with 1584 embryos) with 145 adopting families. To date 81 babies have been born, and 10 adopting families are currently expecting at least 15 babies.”

Frequently Asked Questions (Snowflakes Embryo Adoption Program), Revised April 2005

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Life, Adoption

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com