ERLC urges action on indecency bill

By Tom Strode - Aug 5, 2008 - comment

The Southern Baptist Convention’s ethics entity is urging support for legislation to reaffirm the federal government’s authority to regulate broadcast indecency.

Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, called for action on the bill after a federal appeals court struck down a $550,000 fine by the Federal Communications Commission against CBS. The FCC fine was levied against the network for telecasting the baring of one of singer Janet Jackson’s breasts during the controversial 2004 Super Bowl halftime show. That display brought a deluge of criticism from many Americans, including legislators and the FCC.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals, however, ruled July 21 that the FCC departed from a nearly 30-year policy by fining the network for a fleeting image of indecency. The court said the commission previously had issued a fine only when the indecency was so “pervasive as to amount to ‘shock treatment’ for the audience.”

The appeals court “has in effect given the green light for broadcast television networks to air indecent material any hour of the day,” Land said in a July 30 “action alert” e-mail sent to Southern Baptists and other ERLC constituents. “This egregious decision ignores more than a half-million complaints to the FCC and leaves that agency virtually powerless to enforce a broadcast indecency bill” enacted in 2006.

Land urged passage of the Protecting Children From Indecent Programming Act, S. 1780, to combat the Third Circuit opinion. The bill would require the FCC to “maintain a policy that a single word or image may constitute indecent programming.”

A Senate committee reported the bill to the full chamber last year, but no further action has been taken on it. The Senate, in effect, went into recess Aug. 1 and will not reconvene for legislative business until Sept. 8.

Land asked recipients of the “action alert” to call the legislation’s sponsor, Sen. John Rockefeller, D.-W.Va., and urge him to call for Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada to bring the bill to the Senate floor for a vote. Rockefeller’s office phone number is 202-224-6472.

In 2006, Congress approved and President Bush signed into law a measure increasing by tenfold the maximum fine for indecency on television and radio. The Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act increased the maximum penalty that can be levied by the FCC from $32,500 to $325,000.

In its action regarding the 2004 Super Bowl show, the FCC fined 20 CBS-owned television stations $27,500 apiece in achieving the $550,000 total penalty against the network.

Though the Protecting Children From Indecent Programming Act has only 11 cosponsors in the Senate, it is a bipartisan group—six Republicans and five Democrats. Rep. Chip Pickering, R.-Miss., has introduced a companion bill by the same name in the House. That measure, H.R. 3559, has 24 cosponsors, but it has yet to move out of a committee.

The legislation does not directly affect cable or satellite programming. The FCC is able to regulate only broadcast radio and television. On TV, that includes such networks as ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals is based in Philadelphia.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Children, Pop Culture, Citizenship,

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com