Fight for marriage continues in Congress

By Tom Strode - Aug 13, 2004 - comment

It appears the House of Representatives will vote on a constitutional amendment to protect marriage before it adjourns, even though the Senate has already rejected such an effort.

Supporters of H.J. Res. 56, sponsored by Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, R.-Colo., report the House is expected to vote on the proposal the week of Sept. 20 or shortly thereafter. The amendment has been named the Federal Marriage Amendment, but at least some proponents of the measure are referring to it now as the Marriage Protection Amendment. The amendment would define marriage as only between a man and a woman. It also is designed to prevent courts from legalizing same-sex “marriage.”

The Federal Marriage Amendment failed in a procedural vote in the Senate July 14. The FMA fell far short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture and break a filibuster. The vote was 50-48 against invoking cloture, thereby preventing a direct vote on the amendment.

The House, however, approved by a 233-194 vote the Marriage Protection Act July 22. The bill would bar federal courts, even the Supreme Court, from reviewing the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 measure that protects the rights of states not to recognize another state’s homosexual “marriages” and prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex “marriage.”

In other news:

  • The third “Battle for Marriage” rally and simulcast will be held Sept. 19. Like the rallies on May 23 and July 11, the event will promote the biblical view of marriage and call for support of a federal amendment to protect the institution. The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission is one of the sponsors of the event, and ERLC President Richard Land is expected to speak. Churches may find out how to participate in the simulcast by accessing www.wevotevalues.com . The third rally originally was scheduled Aug. 29.
  • Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Carol Ball has upheld a 1913 state law that essentially bars out-of-state, homosexual couples from obtaining marriage licenses, according to Baptist Press. On Aug. 18, Ball refused a request by eight same-sex couples from other states to enjoin the law. Massachusetts is the only state with legalized homosexual “marriage.”

You may express your opinion on H.J. Res. 56 by calling the capitol switchboard, (202) 225-3121, and asking for your representative.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com