Funds blocked for U.N. agency linked to Chinese program

By Tom Strode - Jun 15, 2004 - comment

The Bush administration has once again blocked $34 million designated to a controversial United Nations family planning fund linked to support of China’s coercive population control program.

Secretary of State Colin Powell announced July 16 the money designated by Congress for the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA) would be withheld for the third consecutive year. The administration determined contributions to the organization would still violate the Kemp-Kasten amendment, a 1985 measure that bars family planning money from going to any entity that, as determined by the President, “supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”

The House of Representatives Appropriations Committee voted 32-26 a week earlier against an amendment that would have provided $25 million for the UNFPA in next year’s budget.

Barrett Duke, the ERLC’s vice president for public policy, commended the action but said, “It is disconcerting, however, that 26 members of the committee considered the UNFPA to be an acceptable recipient of $25 million from taxpayers. I wonder if they would have been quite so eager to support UNFPA if it were their wives or daughters who were going to be victimized by the Chinese government’s barbaric population control program. U.S. taxpayer dollars should be used to support life and programs that honor life.”

The UNFPA has denied charges it supports coercive population control, but a U.S. investigative team in 2002 reported the UNFPA provided computers and vehicles to Chinese population-control offices, a State Department spokesman said. An independent investigation in 2001 provided evidence the UNFPA was helping in China’s program. A team from the Population Research Institute, an American pro-life organization, reported witnesses told it the family planning in a UNFPA-run program was involuntary. Coercion, in the form of not only sterilization and abortion but imprisonment and property destruction, existed in the UNFPA program, according to the report.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com