Here’s What You Need to Know About the Parental Notification Abortion Bills

By Chadd Hodges - Sep 9, 2006 - 1

Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (H.R. 748)

What

A bill “to prevent the transportation of minors in circumvention of certain laws relating to abortion, and for other purposes.” This bill also places requirements on abortion doctors: “A physician who knowingly performs or induces an abortion on a minor in violation of the requirements of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Why

This bill will help protect parents’ rights in states that have enacted parental notification or consent laws regarding abortions for minor girls. Twenty-nine states already have laws requiring the consent or notification of at least one parent prior to a minor obtaining an abortion. The problem is that state parental notification and consent laws are often circumvented when minors are transported to other states that do not require parental involvement. This bill would make it a federal offense to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of obtaining an abortion without the consent of a parent. It would also require an abortion doctor in a state without a parental involvement law to inform a parent before he or she performs an abortion on a minor who lives in a different state.

The Good News

The House of Representatives, in a 270-157 vote, passed this bill on April 27, 2005.

Child Custody Protection Act (S. 403)

What

A bill “to prohibit taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions.”

Why

This bill will also help protect the rights of parents and ensure the well being of young girls. It is essentially the same bill without the clause requiring physicians to ensure the notification of the minor’s parent(s).

The Good News

The Senate, in a bipartisan 65-34 vote, passed this bill on July 25, marking the first time the Senate has passed such a proposal. Until the action, the Senate had never voted on such legislation, even though the House of Representatives had approved a similar bill four times.

A Stipulation

Because the versions approved by the Senate and the House of Representatives differ, a conference committee—consisting of members from both houses—must reconcile the two already-passed versions so that the President can sign the measure into law.

The Bad News

After this bill passed, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist moved for the bill to go to a conference committee in order to reconcile its differences with the House version. Sen. Richard Durbin, D.-Ill., the assistant minority leader, objected to this routine request, thereby halting the advancement of the bill. Durbin’s opposition is an attempt to kill the bill by “running out the clock” as the 109th Congress ends. If Senator Durbin is successful in stopping this bill’s progress, the House and Senate will be required to vote on and pass these bills again in the upcoming 110th Congress.

Take Action and Make a Difference

If you agree that young girls from states with parental notification laws should not be able to receive abortions in another state without their parents’ consent, and if you agree that abortion doctors should be held accountable to ensure that parents know before their daughter receives an abortion, then please tell your senators to demand that the Democratic leadership withdraw their objection. It is vital that we contact them via phone and/or e-mail to demand that the Child Custody Protection Act makes it to conference. You can reach your senators by dialing the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121. If you prefer email, just click here and follow the instructions.

For your convenience, the fourteen Democratic senators who voted in favor of the bill are listed below, along with their phone numbers. Please contact these senators and ask them to demand that their leadership allow S. 403 to go to conference.

We must seek to save every life possible and help young women receive the guidance they need before making a decision of such gravity. Thank you for caring enough to help protect these young girls and to offer greater hope for a full life for the precious unborn lives inside them.

Evan Bayh (IN)202-224-5623
Robert C. Byrd (WV)202-224-3954
Thomas R. Carper (DE)202-224-2441
Kent Conrad (ND)202-224-2043
Byron L. Dorgan (ND)202-224-2551
Daniel K. Inouye (HI)202-224-3934
Tim Johnson (SD)202-224-2321
Herb Kohl (WI)202-224-5653
Mary L. Landrieu (LA)202-224-5824
Bill Nelson (FL)202-224-5274
Benjamin E. Nelson (NE)202-224-6551
Mark L. Pryor (AR)202-224-2353
Harry Reid (NV)202-224-3542
Ken Salazar (CO)202-224-5852

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Parenting, Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Legislation, National

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Sep 1st, 2006, at 4:41pm, Jean Closson wrote:

A great article and well written

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com