Homiletic wimp?

By John Yeats - Jul 26, 2007 - 5

ALEXANDRIA, La. (BP)—The media is bristling with political banter. Most of us already are sick of all the talk and posturing. However, in a little more than 16 months, Americans will go to the polls and cast their votes for a new president. Will he or she represent our biblical values?

Next year’s presidential election could be the most strategic one since the 1960 race between Kennedy and Nixon. Perhaps the most ominous issue for this year is the reality that the next president will select as many as three new Supreme Court justices. This court makes decisions that impact our lives, and, consequently, responsible Christians must look past the war in Iraq and the state of the economy, and vote their values on who will become the next leader of the most powerful, most economically blessed nation in history.

If things hold true as they have in the past, prior to the election, pastors across America will received a letter from a pseudo-authoritative source for church and state issues. Americans United (AU) touts itself as the last word on First Amendment rights. The letter will use scare tactic claims such as “your church will lose its tax exempt status.”

In the 2000 election year, Barry Lynn, AU executive director, wrote, “Federal tax law, which governs the activities of houses of worship, prohibits churches from engaging in partisan politics on behalf of or in opposition to a presidential candidate.”

Did you see what he said? “Federal tax law, which governs the activities of houses of worship….” What is the government doing policing the activities of a church? If the federal tax law determines what we do in our churches, then it is the foulest breach of separation of church and state imaginable. A government entity determining what is acceptable or not acceptable in a church sounds like something from a totalitarian strategy book.

Looking at its track record, the Americans United organization is not as interested in separation of church and state as it is in using its influence to silence the voices of American pulpits and organizations that disagree with a leftist vision of religious liberty. With its letter in 2000, AU attempted to intimidate pastors into thinking they must become homiletic wimps or lose their church’s tax exemption.

During a presidential election process, the idea of a church being silent on significant moral issues rubs across the grain of American history. Can you imagine the great preacher Charles G. Finney refusing to speak about abolition? Rather, Finney openly encouraged his audiences to vote for abolition and even added that Abraham Lincoln would be the best candidate to support abolition. Our history is seasoned with men of God who stood in the pulpits and streets and preached for civil rights, and against certain military actions, injustice, child labor, and the barbaric practice of abortion. If we are to maintain any vestige of liberty, the government must never police the pulpits.

The First Amendment protects the right of pastors to preach about moral issues. As your pastor courageously speaks to the significant social/moral issues of this day, encourage him with your support.

Many politicians have treated evangelical Christians as a simplistic electorate. Part of the reason is because we refuse to look past the sanctity of human life issues. This one issue says more about a person’s decision-making process than any other statement a candidate makes. Political handlers think evangelicals are gullible. How many times have conservative Christians placed their trust in elected leaders who use “values rhetoric” on the campaign trail but abandon those values once in office? Sometimes, we are enamored with those who speak “God talk.”

We must do better at distinguishing between actions and talk before the election. How can we do that? Look at the candidate’s record in relationship to what you believe is morally important. Examine how his/her record measures up with key issues. Recognize that the secular media has a general bias against your Christian values. Study the issues. Listen closely to debates and campaign speeches — are there any lifestyle choice discrepancies in a candidate’s position on key issues?

Most importantly, pray. Pray for godly wisdom, and vote.

John L. Yeats is the SBC recording secretary and director of communications for the Louisiana Baptist Convention. This column first appeared in LBC Live, a publication of the Louisiana Baptist Convention.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Christian Citizenship

5 comments (post your own) feed

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com