Human trafficking rises to presidential proportions

By Doug Carlson - Apr 15, 2008 - comment

The road to the White House in 2008 has exposed differing opinions among the presidential candidates on issues ranging from abortion to health care to the economy, but on one topic that has gone virtually unmentioned in speeches and debates each of them could sound the same note.

ERLC President Richard Land, who does not endorse political candidates, is calling upon the three leading White House contenders to add human trafficking to their campaign platforms.

On April 14, Land sent letters to Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), John McCain (R-AZ) and Barack Obama (D-IL) urging them to “vigorously and vocally” support legislation to help both free the millions throughout the world who are forced or coerced into sex or labor industries and prosecute their buyers and sellers.

“I strongly urge you to demonstrate the kind of leadership of which you are capable by making this issue a central component of your campaign platform and by actively supporting the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2007 (H.R. 3887),” stated Land.

The legislation bears the name of the British parliamentarian whose Christian convictions compelled him to work toward the abolition of the slave trade in Britain. In 1807, after years laboring to overcome the apathy and opposition of many of his countrymen and colleagues in parliament, Wilberforce finally witnessed Britain outlaw its slave trade.

In this spirit, Land entreated each candidate to be “the Wilberforce of our day,” noting that the legislation “will build on our already tremendous successes internationally and also enable us to deal more decisively with trafficking in our own country.”

An estimated 800,000 people, primarily women and children, are trafficked across international borders every year, a significant number of whom are victimized by the growing sex trafficking industry. They are then forced to sell their bodies as often as dozens of times daily, but receive little more than routine beatings from their pimps, who collect virtually all profits.

A 2000 trafficking law, the basis for the Wilberforce Act, has ratcheted up pressure among nations worldwide to clamp down on the trafficking industry, but domestic efforts have not fared as successfully.

“We cannot possibly continue to require the rest of the world to do more than we are willing to do right here at home,” stated Land in the letter. “Through this bill the federal government will be better able to assist the states in their efforts to eradicate sex trafficking by choking it at its core—the pimps and suppliers of women and girls. It will also provide more resources to help rescue the women and children who have been brutalized by this slave trade.”

Enclosed with Land’s letter was a letter he and 149 diverse leaders sent March 20 to members of the Senate Foreign Relations and Judiciary Committees, the key panels that could determine the fate of the legislation, urging them to support the House bill. He also spotlighted an opinion piece entitled “The Pimps’ Slaves” by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof and an article that appeared in Prism magazine, which uses a timeline of pictures taken over several years to show the physical deterioration of women battered and bruised by their pimps.

The gravity of addressing human trafficking ought to make the issue more than just a convenient talking point on a campaign stump. It should embolden presidential candidates and average Americans to work to expunge the slavery in our midst. Each of us must do our part to carry the torch of Wilberforce and others committed to this ideal.

If you agree that no man, woman, boy, or girl should be bought and sold into a life of slavery, please tell Sens. Clinton, McCain, and Obama, as well as your state’s U.S. Senators, to support the House-passed Wilberforce Act (H.R. 3887).

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Abuse, Sexual Abuse, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com