Illinois church wins first round of religious liberty court battle

By Marty King - Apr 7, 2008 - comment

CARLINVILL, Ill.—Carlinville Southern Baptist Church “can do everything we want in the new facility except use it for worship,” according to the church’s First Amendment attorney, Daniel Dalton.

Dalton, a religious liberty rights specialist from Michigan, made the statement following a March 20th U.S. Federal Court ruling that allows the church to remodel a former Wal-Mart store to accommodate the growing Southern Baptist congregation.

“It was actually a great day for us when the Federal Court in Springfield entered an order allowing us to continue renovating the building and to utilize it for offices, a day care center and other things,” Dalton said. A decision on more complicated First Amendment issues that will allow the church to also worship on the property will probably come later this month.

As it has done in many communities, Wal-Mart built a new super store in Carlinville, a community of 6,000 residents located between Springfield, IL and St. Louis, MO. and attempted to sell their old building. After six months, Wal-Mart had been unable to sell the property so Carlinville Southern, having experienced significant growth the past few years, purchased the 60,000 square-foot building.

The former Wal-Mart property was zoned commercial by the City of Carlinville which allowed uses as an “auditorium” defined “as part of a church, theater, school or recreation building.” At the time, however, churches were only being allowed in areas zoned “R” for religious or rehabilitative, even though two other churches in town were already located in property zoned commercial.

The church applied to have the property rezoned “R” but was denied because the church is tax-exempt.

Carlinville Mayor Robert Schwab told the local news media the city has been ravaged by business closings and needs the revenue of a commercial enterprise rather than a church. “The city must look out for the economic interest of the entire community,” Schwab said.

The church attempted to meet with city officials to resolve the issue amicably, but instead the city filed a lawsuit in state court seeking an injunction to prevent the church from renovating the facility or moving any of its offices to the site. The church filed suit in Federal Court alleging violation of its First and Fourteenth Amendment rights as well as violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).

RLUIPA is a federal statute intended to protect churches and religious institutions from discrimination and unreasonable burdens imposed by land use regulations. Courts have held that RLUIPA prevents governments from discriminating against churches just because they are tax-exempt and reduce tax revenues for a city – exactly what the City of Carlinville is posing as its reason for refusing to rezone the property.

Carlinville Pastor Tim Rhodus asked Christians to pray the matter will be resolved quickly so the church can expand its witness to the community.

“This is not about a building, and we’re not just trying to win a court case,” Rhodus told The Illinois Baptist. “We’re asking God for a spiritual awakening for our entire community. Everyone in this area is paying attention, and we need God to show-up in undeniable ways so that undecided masses recognize His power.”

This article is reprinted from the March 28, 2008, issue of The Illinois Baptist, the newspaper of the Illinois Baptist State Association.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Faith, Ministry, Citizenship, Legislation, Religious Liberty

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com