In letter, ERLC’s Land urges candidates to support anti-trafficking legislation

By Tom Strode - Apr 29, 2008 - comment

Southern Baptist ethics leader Richard Land has called on the leading presidential candidates to support legislation to combat human trafficking and to make the issue a priority in their campaign platforms.

In a letter, the president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission urged Sens. Hillary Clinton, D.-N.Y., John McCain, R.-Ariz., and Barack Obama, D.-Ill., to promote an enhanced anti-trafficking measure that is awaiting a vote in the Senate. The House of Representatives approved the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act in a 405-2 vote in December, but the Senate has yet to act on it.

McCain has clinched the GOP nomination, but Obama and Clinton are still contending to represent Democrats in the fall election.

The bill “will build on our already tremendous successes internationally and also enable us to deal more decisively with trafficking in our own country,” Land wrote to the senators. “Through this bill the federal government will be better able to assist the states in their efforts to eradicate sex trafficking by choking it at its core—the pimps and suppliers of women and girls.”

The measure also will aid in the rescue of women and children who have been trapped in sexual slavery, he said in the April 14 letters.

About 800,000 men, women and children are trafficked across international borders each year, according to the State Department’s Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Office. This does not include millions of victims who are trafficked within their own national borders, the office says. About 80 percent of the transnational victims are females, and as many as 50 percent are minors. The data show the majority of those trafficked across international borders are victims of sexual exploitation.

The TIP Office has estimated as many as 17,500 people are trafficked into the United States each year.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has mounted a campaign against the bill. Land was among 150 conservatives, moderates and liberals who signed a March letter to two Senate committees in which they disagreed with what they described as DOJ-generated complaints from state and local officials. Land and the others said the opposition letters demonstrate “an underlying premise that ‘ordinary’ sex trafficking is a largely victimless crime, and an assertion that the Wilberforce Act seeks to impose morality rather than deter vicious, enslaving crime.”

Supporters of the House-approved bill say it would make the following improvements in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act passed in 2000:

  • It would make sure the law regards “proof of fraud, force, or coercion, and the use of minors by sex traffickers,” as the bases not for conviction but for heightened punishment.
  • It would connect domestic with international trafficking in order to combat both more actively.
  • It would empower the TIP Office to influence other governments to act more aggressively against trafficking.

The legislation is named after the evangelical Christian who led the effort in Parliament year after year to outlaw the British slave trade, a campaign that finally succeeded early in the 19th century.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual Abuse, Children, Citizenship, Human Rights, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com