Land: Bring tobacco under gov. oversight

By Dwayne Hastings - Aug 30, 2007 - comment

Cigarette Butts - iStock

NASHVILLE, Tenn.—It’s a distasteful reality: The federal government carefully regulates products that aid individuals in breaking their addiction to tobacco, yet tobacco products themselves are not regulated by the Federal Drug Administration, Richard Land said August 28.

The SBC ethicist appeared with other religious leaders and local public health experts in a Faith United Against Tobacco press conference in Nashville, Tenn. The group expressed its support for the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which is H.R. 1108 in the House of Representatives and S. 625 in the Senate.

The bill would bring tobacco products under the purview of the FDA, Land said, and would give the FDA authority to regulate tobacco products under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Land is president of the SBC’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.

“The tobacco companies have a problem,” Land said. “Their product kills their customers.” This was the driving force, he said, behind the industry’s insatiable push to attract new consumers and use questionable marketing tactics to reach youngsters.

As early in 1932, Southern Baptists addressed the issue of tobacco in adopting a resolution that called on members of the denomination to “consider the probable ultimate effect of the growing and excessive use of tobacco by our boys and girls,” Land noted.

A 1984 SBC resolution called on parents to abstain from tobacco use to the benefit of their children and urged Southern Baptist tobacco farmers “to cease such agriculture.”

“Every day over 1,000 of our children become addicted to this deadly product,” Land said, adding that he had lost family members to tobacco-related diseases.

Tobacco use, he pointed out, is the “leading preventable cause of death” in the U.S., although tobacco products are “virtually unregulated.”

If the bill passes, Land said the general public would finally discover what “deadly garbage” the tobacco industry is putting in cigarettes. The legislation authorizes the FDA to identify and disclose the ingredients used in tobacco products.

“While each person bears responsibility for whether he or she chooses to engage in tobacco use, responsibility also falls upon those in authority, who have the power to end tobacco deception and significantly reduce the illness and death that it can produce,” Land said.

He emphasized he was not seeking a ban on tobacco products but reasonable oversight of the product. He also expressed regret that “dog food is more regulated for safety than cigarettes.”

“It is morally wrong to know the good that should be done and not do it,” Land said, adding that those in “positions of leadership and power have a moral imperative to safeguard the men, women, and children of our country from falling into the pitfalls of tobacco abuse.”

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Addictions, Substance Abuse, Living, Health, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com