Land: Cultural divide causes furor over religion in politics

By Tom Strode - Sep 1, 2004 - comment

Expressions of faith by presidents and presidential candidates are more controversial because of a growing divide in American society between the religious and nonreligious, not because those statements are more numerous, ERLC President Richard Land said recently.

The “God talk has been around for a long time,” Land said during a Sept. 9 panel discussion of religion in this year’s presidential race.

“The people themselves, if anything, are getting more religious, not less religious,” Land said, citing polls commissioned by the British Broadcasting Co. and the Pew Forum. At the same time, he said, surveys show “there is a growing, pretty rabidly secular segment of the population that is not only nonreligious [but] gets pretty irritated with people who are religious.”

As Yale University law professor Stephen Carter has written, Land said, the legal, social, cultural and religious elites “want to marginalize and trivialize religious faith and make it something that’s purely devotional and purely personal [and] that has no impact on public policy, and I think that that’s why religious expressions have become controversial.”

“It’s not that there are more [religious expressions by public officials and candidates],” Land said. “It’s just that people who are reviewing them and people who are seeking to be the social arbiters are more offended by them” than in the past.

When asked if President George W. Bush had gone too far in talking about his faith, Land contended the current president trails his predecessor in public religious statements.

Through 2003, Bush mentioned Jesus or Christ in 14 separate, public statements, Land said, citing statistics from a new book, God and George W. Bush: A Spiritual Life by Paul Kengor. In Clinton’s eight years in the White House, he mentioned Jesus or Christ 41 times in public statements.

A candidate should not practice self-censorship but should have the right to express his deeply held beliefs, Land said. He should say his religious faith “is part and parcel of who I am. This will help to explain to you how I will approach these public policy issues,” Land said. “And then it’s up to the American people to decide whether that’s the kind of president that they want.”

The First Amendment Center and Youth for Justice cosponsored the panel discussion. The discussion was held at the Arlington, Va., offices of The Freedom Forum, which funds the First Amendment Center.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Christian Citizenship, Church and State, Religious Liberty

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com