Land: Petraeus advice may aid freedom

By Tom Strode - Sep 21, 2007 - comment

Religious freedom in Iraq could benefit from the United States adhering to the recommendation of its military leader there to refrain from an accelerated pullout of its forces, a Southern Baptist ethicist says.

During congressional testimony, Army Gen. David Petraeus, as well as U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker, “made a compelling case for continuing the current surge strategy” in Iraq, Richard Land said after the recent, two-day testimony the men gave to Congress. “By most informed accounts, the strategic ground has shifted in America’s favor in Iraq.”

Such continued success would increase the chances that people in the war-torn country could express their faith freely, said Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.

The “suppression of violence,” he said, is a “necessary first step toward religious freedom in Iraq.”

“Clearly, the cause of religious freedom is enhanced by civil order being restored through the defeat of Al Qaeda and armed and dangerous sectarian militia. Religious freedom is more likely to flourish in societies where there is a commitment to civil order and where non-state actors are not permitted to perpetrate atrocities on those who oppose, or merely disagree with, them,” Land said.

Hearings conducted by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) on Sept. 19 and in late July have demonstrated sectarian violence has had disastrous consequences for numerous religious groups in Iraq. Chaldo-Assyrian Christians and other religious minorities largely have fled the country, witnesses reported. A majority of the refugees fleeing to other countries are members of the Sunni and Shi’a Muslim sects, which are warring with each other, USCIRF was told.

Land is a member of USCIRF, the nine-person, bipartisan panel that researches and reports on global religious liberty issues to Congress and the president.

In the Sept. 10-11 hearings before committees of the House of Representatives and Senate, Petraeus said the troop surge that began earlier this year had largely accomplished its military objectives. The gains have not been consistent throughout Iraq, but the total number of “security incidents” had decreased eight of the previous 12 weeks, he said. Those numbers were lower the two preceding two weeks than at any time since June 2006, Petraeus reported. Ethno-sectarian violence, which was at its height in December, has declined, he said.

The reasons for these improvements, he said, include: Tribes have rejected Al Qaeda in Anbar Province, and that trend has continued in other locales; the American-led coalition and Iraqi troops have dealt important setbacks to Al Qaeda-Iraq and Shi’a militia; and the Iraqi forces have improved.

Under his proposal, Petraeus said, a Marine unit will leave Iraq later in September, and other troops will be removed without being replaced beginning in December until U.S. forces reach their pre-surge level by July 2008. About 130,000 U.S. troops will still remain in Iraq at that time.

A “premature drawdown of our forces would likely have devastating consequences,” Petraeus testified. He said he agreed with an Aug. 16 Defense Intelligence Agency report that predicted such a withdrawal would produce several detrimental effects, including a recovery by Al Qaeda in some areas, as well as an increase in ethno-sectarian violence and refugees.

“The Congress and the nation would do well to heed General Petraeus’ caution against ‘rushing to failure’ when success may be so tantalizingly close at hand,” Land said. “We finally have the right general and right strategy in place. It would be beyond tragic both for Iraq and America if we were to pull the rug out from under General Petraeus and our brave soldiers and Marines just at the time success is within their sight.

“General Petraeus is unusually beloved by his troops because he is seen as one who cares deeply about those soldiers under his command,” he said. “He feels their deaths and injuries personally, and he would not recommend a strategy which he did not believe would succeed, because it would mean exposing his soldiers to needless death and suffering.”

President Bush endorsed Petraeus’ recommendations in a Sept. 13 speech and directed the general and Crocker to report again to Congress in March.

Senate Democrats sought to override the plan with three different proposals between Sept. 19 and 21, but all three failed.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Human Rights, National, Persecution, Religious Liberty, War

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com