Legitimizing the illegitimate

By William H. Perkins, Jr. - Jun 12, 2008 - comment

The recent self-inflicted misfortunes of former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, U.S. Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, and alleged D.C. madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey, among others, has once again brought the “world’s oldest profession” into the harsh spotlight of public scrutiny.

To review, Spitzer was accused of availing himself of the services of a high-priced “escort service”—a prostitution ring, as it turned out and is often the case—in Washington, D.C. The accusation cost him his job, and there are still questions being asked about the shifting of funds used to make multiple payments to the service.

David Vitter admitted in July of this year that he had indeed made multiple telephone calls to an escort service in Washington, D.C., whose main service appears to be prostitution as well. He confessed after his telephone number appeared in the records of Palfrey, who was being investigated by authorities for running the escort service / prostitution ring connected to Vitter.

On May 1, Palfrey hung herself in a storage shed on her mother’s property in Tarpon Springs, Fl. Palfrey had already served a prison sentence in California in the early 1990s on charges of running a prostitution ring.

The ruination of these three lives—and the damage to the lives of those who loved them and believed in them—is virtually incalculable. Spitzer, the married father of three girls, was being touted as possible presidential material. Vitter, a Republican, is the married father of three girls and a boy. A Harvard graduate, his political trajectory was also seen as limitless.

Predictions for Palfrey’s future may not have been impressive, but her suicide is nonetheless a sad tragedy.

It would make common sense to conclude, therefore, that escort services are not the upstanding local businesses that they profess to be, and both the men who frequent them and the women who work there would be well-advised to find other ways to occupy themselves. (The diseases in play at these prostitution rings is a subject for another commentary.)

Not so, says Amanda Brooks, a former escort and “dancer” at a Dallas “gentleman’s club.” She is in the process of writing a series of books entitled, The Internet Escort’s Handbook.

“Written by an escort for escorts,” states the books’ Web site. “A frank discussion of a job rarely mentioned except in gossip or scandal. It’s not terrible or ‘bad’ nor must it be demeaning to either party. Safe, sane, successful escort work is possible.”

It’s interesting that the author of that explanation chooses to place “bad” in quotation marks, as if there is some question as to whether the word applies to the escort / prostitution business. One also wonders about the definition of a “successful” escort.

According to the Web site, Book One includes information on the “basic mental, emotional, and physical considerations in escort work.” Book Two deals with “successfully creating and selling your image online.” Other books are in the pipeline.

The appearance of these escort instruction manuals is a telling commentary on modern American culture. We have become so tolerant of sin on every level that these books gather no outrage—or even mild criticism. We see the escort / prostitution business as simply another way to make a living and not a bad way at that, if a whole series of books can be written about it.

The physical, emotional, spiritual, personal and long-term societal costs to all who indulge in such behavior is rarely considered. Like gambling and drugs (including alcohol), both legal and illegal, we have adopted a hands-off attitude. It’s an individual’s choice, right?

Perhaps we could ask that question of the wives and children of Spitzer and Vitter or the mother of Deborah Jeane Palfrey. Perhaps they’d have a different take on the “escort” business and the consequences of our casual attitude toward sin.

This article is reprinted from the May 15, 2008, issue of The Baptist Record, the newspaper of the Mississippi Baptist Convention.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Addictions, Sexual Purity, Abstinence, Modesty, Pornography

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com