LIFE DIGEST: Breakthrough—adult cells converted into embryonic-like ones

By Tom Strode - Nov 26, 2007 - 1

Adult skin cells in human beings have been converted into embryonic-like stem cells, producing a scientific breakthrough in the field and a dramatic shift in favor of foes of destructive embryo research.

The news, reported Nov. 20 by teams in Wisconsin and Japan, elicited excited responses from both supporters and opponents of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) because of its potential for providing therapies for debilitating diseases. It proved especially rewarding, however, for President Bush and others who have worked to hold back the persistent campaign for the government to fund experiments that destroy human embryos.

The reports showed stem cells that have, in essence, the same properties as embryonic ones can be produced without destroying tiny human beings. A human embryo is killed when stem cells are extracted from it.

The President blocked federal funding for stem cell research that destroys embryos with an executive order in 2001 and has twice vetoed congressional efforts to overturn his ban. In the meantime, some states have approved grants for ESCR.

While the newly revealed breakthrough is unlikely to silence the debate, it certainly would seem to put pro-ESCR public officials, scientists and biotechnology firms on the defensive in seeking to explain why government needs to fund destructive research when what appear to be equally powerful results may be obtained without harming donors.

“We don’t want to jump the gun scientifically, but this may well be the end of the debate over embryonic stem cells,” Southern Baptist bioethicist C. Ben Mitchell said. “This is exactly why many of us were saying, ‘Take the moral high ground and work for ethical alternatives to embryo-destructive research.’

“The interesting feature of this announcement will be to observe how it reframes the political debate, not to mention the way state funding of embryo-destructive research may be altered,” said Mitchell, director of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity and a consultant for the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission. “Embryonic stem cell research may have just become extinct.”

The White House said Bush was “very pleased to see the important advances in ethical stem cell research. By avoiding techniques that destroy life, while vigorously supporting alternative approaches, President Bush is encouraging scientific advancement within ethical boundaries.”

The President promoted in a 2006 speech the type of research with skin cells that has now proven successful and issued an executive order in June calling for funding for such alternative stem cell studies. In fact, federal funds partially underwrote the research on skin cells by the University of Wisconsin team.

The breakthrough with skin cells may not have happened without Bush’s stand against funding destructive research, said bioethics specialist Wesley Smith.

“So thank you for your courageous leadership, Mr. President,” Smith wrote in a commentary for National Review Online. “Because of your willingness to absorb the brickbats of the Science Establishment, the Media Elite, and weak-kneed Republican and Democratic politicians alike – we now have the very real potential of developing thriving and robust stem-cell medicine and scientific research sectors that will bridge, rather than exacerbate, our moral differences over the importance and meaning of human life.”

The newly successful research is known as “somatic cell reprogramming,” or “dedifferentiation.” In the separate studies by the two teams, normal human skin cells were converted into stem cells that were, in effect, embryonic in nature, according to The Washington Post. The researchers refer to the resultant cells as “induced pluripotent stem” (iPS) cells.

Embryonic stem cells are considered “pluripotent,” meaning they can develop into all of the different cell types in the body. Adult stem cells, also referred to as non-embryonic stem cells, typically have been regarded as “multipotent,” meaning they can form many, though not all, of the body’s cell types. Now, there is proof in studies on humans that adult cells can become “pluripotent.”

Stem cells are the body’s master cells that can develop into other cells and tissues, giving hope for the development of cures for a variety of diseases and other ailments.

The research teams were headed by stem cell pioneer James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin and Shinya Yamanaka at Kyoto University, The Post reported. In 1998, Thomson became the first researcher to isolate stem cells from embryos. The Wisconsin and Japanese studies were published in the online versions of the journals Science and Cell, respectively, according to The Post.

In June, Yamanaka’s team successfully performed the reprogramming method in mice.

The stunning reports were issued only days after cloning pioneer Ian Wilmut startled the scientific world by announcing he had abandoned research, or therapeutic, cloning in favor of the method the Yamanaka-led team had used with mice. Wilmut’s Scottish research team created the sheep Dolly, the first mammal cloned from an adult cell, in 1996.

Wilmut, who received a license two years ago in Great Britain to clone human embryos, said he had discontinued his experiments in the cloning field because he believes reprogramming has more potential. It also does not require the controversial procurement of many eggs from females, as well as the destruction of the cloned embryos that would result.

Killing of unborn can be murder, Texas court says

Texas’ highest criminal court ruled Nov. 21 the slaying of an unborn child can be prosecuted as murder without violating a U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of abortion rights.

The Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin unanimously turned down an appeal by Terence Lawrence, who was convicted in the 2004 shooting deaths of his girlfriend, Antwonyia Smith, and their unborn baby, according to the Associated Press. Smith was from four to six weeks into her pregnancy.

The court said the state has the authority to protect unborn life before viability against attacks by a third party, AP reported. Such a law does not contradict the 1973 Roe v. Wade opinion, which legalized abortion rights throughout the country, according to the court.

“The Supreme Court has emphasized that states may protect human life not only once the fetus has reached viability but ‘from the outset of the pregnancy,’” the court said in its opinion, AP reported. “The Legislature is free to protect the lives of those whom it considers to be human beings.”

Sweden embraces ‘abortion tourism’

Sweden has opened the door to what some critics have described as “abortion tourism.”

The Swedish parliament voted 134-124 in favor of legislation to permit foreign women to have abortions in the Scandinavian country, according to the Agence France Presse news service. There were 91 members who abstained from the Nov. 15 vote.

Previously, Swedish law restricted abortions to Swedish women and those living inside the country, unless the national government’s health office granted permission, AFP reported.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, Stem-Cell Research, Science, Bioethics

1 comments (post your own) feed

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com