LIFE DIGEST: Euthanize the kids and old folks, Belgian proposes

By Tom Strode - Mar 31, 2008 - comment

Not enough parents can euthanize their children and not enough people can perform physician-assisted suicide to satisfy some Belgium politicians.

Bart Tommelein, leader of the Liberal Party in Belgium’s coalition government, has promised to introduce legislation to expand euthanasia to terminally ill children, as well as the elderly who have severe dementia, according to the Telegraph, a British newspaper. He also will propose that teenagers be able to choose assisted suicide.

The proposals, bioethics specialist Wesley Smith wrote on the weblog bioethics.com, demonstrate what he has often said – “euthanasia consciousness leads to the bottomless pit.”

“[W]e see that under euthanasia consciousness, even ‘choice’ eventually takes a back seat to death as the answer to human suffering,” said Smith, a lawyer for the International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. “It’s as plain as day: In the words of the late Dutch euthanasia opponent, Dr. Karl Gunning, once killing is seen as the answer to one problem, it soon becomes the answer to 100.”

Belgium law now permits euthanasia for infants and assisted suicide for adults more than 18 years of age, the Telegraph reported.

More than half of the babies in Belgium who die before they are a year old are killed by euthanasia, according to the newspaper. About 40 incidents of euthanasia are reported by Belgian doctors each month, but the actual amount is estimated to be twice that figure, the Telegraph reported.

Belgium and The Netherlands are the only European countries that permit euthanasia and assisted suicide. Those practices are generally permitted in Switzerland, even though they are illegal.

Euthanasia occurs when someone other than the person who dies performs the final act that causes death, according to the International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Assisted suicide takes place when the person who dies commits the last act, such as taking a lethal dose of drugs, the task force says.

High court turns back pro-life sheriff

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to consider an Arizona sheriff’s request he not be forced to take jail inmates to clinics for elective abortions.

The high court announced March 24 it had rejected an appeal by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio after two Arizona courts ruled his office must provide transportation for abortions, The Arizona Republic reported.

“I’m disappointed,” Arpaio said, according to The Republic. “We fought the good fight. I still don’t agree that we should take females on a voluntary basis to an abortion. I’m still against that. But we took it to the highest court, and we’ll see what happens if the situation comes before me again in the jail system.”

In 2004, Arpaio’s office refused to transport a prisoner to a previously scheduled abortion without a court order, the newspaper reported. The court order was issued, and the inmate had an abortion. The American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona sued in order to protect the abortion rights of future prisoners.

The U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals handed a defeat to a similar policy in Missouri prisons in January. The appeals court upheld a federal judge’s 2006 ruling that the policy violated the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which includes “due process” and “equal protection” rights.

Study may aid abortion limit in Great Britain

New data that shows hundreds of babies are surviving extremely early births may boost pro-life efforts to lower the maximum time limit for abortions in Great Britain.

The Department of Health released a report showing more than 900 children were born between 22 and 24 weeks into pregnancy in 2005. Of those babies, 250 survived for at least a year, the Telegraph reported March 27.

The British Parliament may vote as early as April on a measure to roll back the maximum time limit for abortions “for social reasons” from 24 weeks to 20 weeks, according to the London newspaper. Parliament established the 24-week limit in 1990.

Proponents of the legislation say advances in neo-natal care since 1990 have enabled babies to survive earlier than before, meaning the limit should be lowered.

“Even more viable babies are being aborted than these figures would suggest,” said Tory Nadine Dorries, who supports the measure, according to the Telegraph. “If you go into [labor] at 22 weeks, there is something wrong with you or your baby. Most babies aborted at 22 weeks are healthy, so their survival chances would be even higher.”

A February-released study at University College London Hospital showed one-third of children born between 22 and 25 weeks into pregnancy survived in the early 1980s while 71 percent did so in the late 1990s, the Telegraph reported.

St. Louis Archdiocese stands strong on Komen

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis has reiterated a position statement discouraging support for Susan G. Komen for the Cure only days after the Diocese of Little Rock, Ark., backtracked on such a stance.

The St. Louis Archdiocese said in a March 11 document its Respect Life Apostolate “neither supports nor encourages” involvement in events that benefit Komen for the Cure, which is a leading fundraising organization that promotes breast cancer research, prevention and treatment. The Archdiocese, which first took the position in 2006, said its refusal to endorse participation in the charity is based on:

— Komen’s policy permitting its affiliates to provide grants to Planned Parenthood chapters;

— Komen’s endorsement of stem cell research that destroys embryos;

— Komen’s denial of a link between abortion and breast cancer.

The Little Rock Diocese had issued a similar statement citing the same three reasons Feb. 4 but reversed itself March 6. Gaston Hebert, the diocesan administrator, withdrew the statement after visiting with Komen officials.

Planned Parenthood chapters in at least 13 states received funding from Komen for the Cure in 2005, according to the St. Louis statement. Despite the grants, Planned Parenthood said in its 2005-06 report its affiliates performed 9,900 more abortions and 81,500 fewer breast exams in 2005 than in 2004, the St. Louis Archdiocese reported.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America is the country’s largest abortion provider. Its affiliates performed more than 289,000 abortions in 2006, the most recent year for which there are records.

Komen for the Cure sponsors five-kilometer runs/walks in cities across the country, with more than 1 million participants each year in the fundraising events.

Abortion doctor given 20 years in death of wife

Notorious abortion doctor Malachy DeHenre has been sentenced to 20 years in prison in the shooting death of his wife.

A Mississippi county judge gave DeHenre the maximum sentence for manslaughter March 13, the Laurel (Miss.) Leader-Call reported. Ten years ago, DeHenre’s first trial in his wife’s 1997 death ended in a mistrial, according to the report.

DeHenre – whose medical licenses were suspended in Alabama, Mississippi and New York – left a trail of damaged women from his abortion practice. An Alabama patient died 18 hours after he did an abortion on her, and women in three other cases had hysterectomies after suffering uterine perforation during DeHenre-performed abortions, according to LifeNews.com.

Malta rejects European council’s call to legalize abortion

The Republic of Malta says it will not bow to pressure from the Council of Europe (CoE) to legalize abortion.

A CoE committee approved a non-binding resolution calling for all member countries to drop restrictions on a woman’s right to choose an abortion, the Times of Malta reported March 23. Malta, which is located in the Mediterranean Sea, is one of four CoE members that have not legalized abortion. The others are Andorra, Ireland and Poland, according to the Times.

The CoE, which has 47 members and is separate from the European Union, will meet in mid-April to discuss the resolution, the newspaper reported.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to protect the sanctity of human life. If you would like to learn more about this issue, additional resources are available here. If your church is interested in purchasing materials on the sanctity of human life, please visit our online bookstore and erlc.com.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, End-of-Life Issues, Stem-Cell Research

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com