LIFE DIGEST: Evidence continues to show Komen supports Planned Parenthood

By Tom Strode - Apr 22, 2008 - 1

Affiliates of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a leading fundraising organization for breast cancer research, gave more than $700,000 to Planned Parenthood during the 2005-06 fiscal year, according to a group that monitors the country’s leading abortion provider.

Komen chapters gave $711,485 to 25 Planned Parenthood affiliates from April 2005 through March 2006, Stop Planned Parenthood (STOPP) International reported April 9.

The documentation of Komen’s funding of Planned Parenthood provided further support for calls for pro-life advocates to refuse to participate in events that benefit Komen.

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis reiterated just such a position in March based on:

  • Komen’s policy permitting its affiliates to provide grants to Planned Parenthood chapters;
  • Komen’s endorsement of stem cell research that destroys embryos;
  • Komen’s denial of a link between abortion and breast cancer.

Eighty percent of epidemiological studies in the last 50 years have shown abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, according to the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer.

Planned Parenthood said in its 2005-06 report its affiliates performed 9,900 more abortions and 81,500 fewer breast exams in 2005 than in 2004, the St. Louis Archdiocese reported.

“The fact that Komen affiliates give money to Planned Parenthood contradicts Komen’s claim that it works to end breast cancer,” Jim Sedlak of STOPP told LifeNews.com. “This is ridiculous and must stop.”

The Catholic dioceses of Phoenix, Ariz., and Charleston, S.C., reportedly have also discouraged participation in Komen fundraising events.

Komen’s best known fundraisers are its five-kilometer runs/walks in cities across the country. More than 1 million people participate each year in the runs/walks.

Planned Parenthood’s affiliates provided more than 289,000 abortions during calendar year 2006, according to its latest report.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America surpassed $1 billion in annual revenue for the first time during the 2006-07 fiscal year. Of its latest yearly revenue, $336.7 million came in government grants and contracts.

Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, urged Americans to support a congressional effort to eliminate family planning funding of Planned Parenthood.

“It is outrageous that Planned Parenthood, the nation’s leading abortion provider, continues to reach into the pocket of the American taxpayer to the tune of 336 million dollars per annum,” Land said.

Oklahoma legislators override veto of ultrasound bill

The Oklahoma legislature convincingly overrode a veto April 17 to enact what a national pro-life organization described as the best ultrasound law in the country.

The Oklahoma Senate voted 37-11 and the House of Representatives 81-15 to overturn the veto of Democratic Gov. Brad Henry. The Senate easily achieved the required two-thirds majority despite being equally divided between Democrats and Republicans, according to the Tulsa World.

The new version of Oklahoma’s ultrasound law requires a medical worker to perform an ultrasound on a woman seeking an abortion, display the image of the unborn child and explain the sonogram, according to the Tulsa World. The mother is not required to view the image.

“By strengthening the ultrasound provision of their law, the Oklahoma legislature has created the strongest, most protective ultrasound law in the nation,” said Mary Spaulding Balch, state legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC). “They are doing everything possible to ensure that a mother is given the opportunity to see her unborn child in real-time and learn all the facts before making the life and death decision of abortion.”

Oklahoma is one of 13 states to adopt legislation mandating abortion doctors must at least offer a woman the opportunity to see a sonogram of the child in her womb, according to NRLC. The others are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah and Wisconsin. Louisiana’s law is different than the others, according to NRLC, in that it requires an ultrasound on any woman at least 20 weeks pregnant before offering her the chance to view the image.

Pregnancy care centers have reported dramatic upswings in clients choosing to give birth after viewing ultrasound images of their babies.

European council calls for unlimited abortion rights

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (CoE) has approved a resolution calling for member countries to drop all restriction on abortion rights.

On April 16, the assembly voted 102-69 for the measure, which is nonbinding.

Pat Buckley of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children described the decision as a “tragic day for Europe.”

“The resolution represents an attack on the sovereignty of member states, by attempting to impose a policy on abortion, something for which the Assembly has no legal or legitimate justification,” Buckley said in a written statement.

Four CoE members – Andorra, Ireland, Malta and Poland – have not legalized abortion, according to the Times of Malta.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to protect the sanctity of human life. If you would like to learn more about this issue, additional resources are available here. If your church is interested in purchasing materials on the sanctity of human life, please visit our online bookstore and erlc.com.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Apr 22nd, 2008, at 12:35pm, joel wrote:

So are there alternatives to Komen available?  If someone wants to support breast cancer research and be assured that their donation will actually go to such research and nothing else, what options if any are out there?

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com