LIFE DIGEST: Wisconsin gov. vetoes conscience clause bill

By Tom Strode - Oct 17, 2005 - comment

WASHINGTON (BP)—It doesn’t pay to be a healthcare provider in Wisconsin and have a pro-life conscience.

Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle has vetoed for the second year a bill that would have helped protect doctors and other medical professions from being forced to participate in such procedures as abortion, embryo-destructive research and assisted suicide.

The legislation “would allow a doctor to put his or her political beliefs ahead of the patient’s medical best interests,” Doyle, a Democrat, said when he vetoed the bill Oct. 14. “[T]his legislation ought to be called the ‘unconscionable clause’” instead of the conscience clause, he said.

Healthcare providers think the legislation is “very necessary,” Wisconsin Right to Life legislative director Susan Armacost told the Associated Press, according to LifeNews.com. “The whole atmosphere is not very amenable to people who don’t want to kill their patients.”

Supporters do not have the votes needed to override Doyle’s veto, Armacost told The Capital Times, a Madison, Wis., newspaper.

ACTIVIST BEATEN –- A blind activist who has campaigned against coercive population control policies in China was beaten recently, as were three lawyers seeking to assist in his case.

Chen Guangcheng, who is blind, was left on the main street of his home town with various injuries after the Oct. 4 beating by local officials, Radio Free Asia reported. Chen, 34, had filed a class-action lawsuit against authorities in the eastern Chinese city of Linyi for forcing women to have abortions and sterilizations.

The lawyers – Xu Zhiyong, Li Subin and Li Fangping – had come to Linyi to help mediate between local officials and Chen, who effectively has been under house arrest, according to the report. Unidentified men attacked the lawyers while they were in the city, Radio Free Asia reported.

Officials in many parts of China have practiced a forced population control program for about 25 years in an attempt to curb the birth rate in the world’s most populous country. A law codifying the policy throughout China went into effect in 2002.

The policy limits couples in urban areas to one child and those in rural areas to two, if the first is a girl. Other exceptions have been made in some provinces, and the enforcement of the policy has varied among provinces. The program has been marked by coercive sterilization and abortion, but infanticide, especially of females, also has been reported.

The Beijing government announced Sept. 19 it had fired some officials in Linyi for abusing the population control policy, The Washington Post reported. The government, however, did not specify what crimes were committed.

RU 486 SUIT -– A lawsuit has been filed against a California Planned Parenthood affiliate in the death of a young woman after use of the abortion drug RU 486.

The husband and daughter of Hoa Thuy Tran have sued Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino counties, as well as Danco Laboratories and the Population Council, as a result of her December 2003 death, the Los Angeles Times reported, according to LifeNews.com. Danco Laboratories markets RU 486 in the United States, and the Population Council holds the patent to the drug.

Tran, a 21-year-old college student, died after going through the two-step regimen. Her husband is Charlie Nguyen; her daughter, Destiny Nguyen, is 5, according to the report.

At least four California women have died after taking RU 486. In July, Danco announced two California women had died, one in 2004 and the other in 2005, after using the regimen to abort their unborn children. Danco had previously reported two other California users of RU 486 died in 2003 and a Canadian woman died after its use in 2001. Other reports have cited additional deaths by RU 486 users — three in Europe, one in the Philippines and another in the United States.

Legislation has been introduced that would remove RU 486 from the market while a review is conducted of the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the drug. The bill is known as Holly’s Law in memory of Holly Patterson, 18, who died of a systemic infection in 2003 after obtaining RU 486 from a Planned Parenthood clinic in Hayward, Calif.

RU 486, or mifepristone, is used as the first part of a process normally occurring in the first seven weeks of pregnancy. That initial action causes the lining of the uterus to release the embryonic child. A second drug, known as misoprostol, is taken two days after mifepristone and causes the uterus to contract, expelling the baby.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Persecution, Religious Liberty

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com