Marriage amendment reintroduced in Senate

By Tom Strode - Feb 15, 2005 - comment

Supporters of a constitutional amendment to protect marriage have initiated what they hope will be a successful effort in the new Congress.

Sen. Wayne Allard, R.-Colo., reintroduced the Marriage Protection Amendment, S.J.Res. 1, with 24 cosponsors Jan. 24. Two more cosponsors have since been added. A House of Representatives version has yet to be introduced.

The amendment would define marriage as the “union of a man and a woman.” The text also says, “Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.”

Shannon Royce, executive director of the Marriage Amendment Project of the Arlington Group, said the number of cosponsors is “very exciting.”

“It demonstrates the importance of the issue to the American people and the understanding in the Senate that this issue must be addressed,” said Royce, also a consultant for the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission. “I look forward to working with Southern Baptists to preserve the biblical and traditional definition of marriage.”

The Arlington Group is a coalition of pro-family organizations working together on marriage and other issues. The ERLC is a member.

Attempts to pass an amendment last year after same-sex marriages were approved at state and local levels fell short in both the Senate and House. To be ratified, a federal amendment must be approved by two-thirds of both the Senate and House, as well as by three-fourths of the states.

President Bush restated his endorsement of a federal marriage amendment in his State of the Union speech Feb. 2.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com