New law may reduce Down abortions

By Tom Strode - Oct 16, 2008 - comment

President Bush has signed into law a measure that may help to curtail the number of abortions of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome and other conditions.

The Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act requires parents whose children receive a diagnosis of Down syndrome or another malady to be provided with the latest information on the condition and be informed of support services available. This would apply to a diagnosis on a child before birth or until a year after birth. The measure also would establish a registry of families willing to adopt special needs children.

The measure seeks to address the reported lack of information and support given to parents whose unborn children test positive for conditions such as Down syndrome.

It has been estimated about 90 percent of American children diagnosed in the womb with Down syndrome are aborted, sometimes after their parents have been given hopeless descriptions of their offsprings’ futures. A similar abortion percentage exists for unborn babies diagnosed with spina bifida, cystic fibrosis and dwarfism, the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Sam Brownback, R.-Kan., has reported.

“This is a great victory for the culture of life we should all seek to promote,” Brownback said in a written statement after Bush signed the bill Oct. 8. “[The 90 percent abortion rate for unborn babies diagnosed with Down syndrome] is much too high and suggests that we as a society are not doing everything we can to protect every human life, at every stage.”

The new law means parents “will be more likely to receive up-to-date, scientific information about life expectancy, clinical course, intellectual and functional development, and prenatal and postnatal treatment options,” the National Down Syndrome Society and National Down Syndrome Congress said in a joint release after Congress approved the legislation.

Currently, “the information that is all too often being provided … is outdated and inaccurate,” the organizations said. “The treatment options, functional development, opportunities and accomplishments of individuals with Down syndrome have improved dramatically over the years, yet decades old stereotypes still persist.”

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) made a recommendation in January 2007 that pro-life advocates said would likely increase the number of abortions of Down syndrome-diagnosed babies. ACOG recommended all pregnant women, no matter their age, be offered testing for the condition. Previously, women 35 years and older were automatically offered testing for the condition, according to ACOG.

The bill’s enactment came less than six weeks after Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her family, which includes a son with Down syndrome, came into the national spotlight. The Republican nominee for vice president learned through prenatal testing that her fifth child, Trig, would be born with Down syndrome. Palin, a pro-lifer, gave birth to Trig in April.

The House of Representatives passed the bill by voice vote Sept. 25, two days after the Senate approved it by unanimous consent.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D.-Mass., was the lead cosponsor of the Brownback-authored bill.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Children, Life, Abortion, Disabled, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com