Outcry on Abstinence Ed, Abortion Policies Delays AIDS Relief Package

By Doug Carlson - Feb 12, 2008 - comment

PEPFAR logo

More information about the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) may be found at PEPFAR.gov

Concerns on abstinence education funding cuts and abortion promotion within a $50 billion AIDS relief package resonated far and wide last week, carrying enough force to prompt delay on the measure in Congress.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission has expressed strong opposition to the current draft of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) reauthorization bill, citing its cut in funding for abstinence and fidelity education programs and mandate that groups receiving funds integrate HIV/AIDS prevention programs with “reproductive services” and “family planning,” softer terms for abortion.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee has rescheduled its markup for Feb. 14. If you share our concerns about the proposed changes to the president’s original plan for PEPFAR, please be sure that the House Committee on Foreign Affairs continues to hear from you.

Last week, we urged you to tell members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee to oppose the PEPFAR reauthorization bill unless these and other pro-family concerns are fully addressed. Thanks in part to the calls and e-mails from many of you, the committee postponed its Feb. 7 scheduled markup, or review, of the bill for a week.

The State Department also registered its complaints about the proposed PEPFAR legislation in a letter sent last week to Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA), author of the bill and chairman of the committee reviewing the bill.

Since its implementation in 2003, PEPFAR has been a proven success in combating HIV/AIDS in Africa, largely through its “abstinence” and “be faithful” programming—two components of the ABC Model (abstinence, be faithful, and condoms). The five-year reauthorization proposal, however, would remove the current requirement that at least one-third of all funding be directed toward these programs. In turn, the abortion industry would be aided as each recipient of PEPFAR dollars working in HIV/AIDS relief would be required to refer for family planning services, which may include abortion.

Another alarming provision is the removal of an existing requirement that grant recipients oppose prostitution and sex trafficking. These industries can easily spread HIV/AIDS and should be condemned for victimizing and enslaving individuals, primarily women and girls. Further, the draft legislation doubles funding for the Global Fund, which is believed to have funded groups promoting China’s one-child policy.

The United States should renew its HIV/AIDS relief efforts in Africa, but it should not do so at the expense of pro-family principles built into the original program that have contributed to its success.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee has rescheduled its markup for Feb. 14. If you share our concerns about the proposed changes to the president’s original plan for PEPFAR, please be sure that the House Committee on Foreign Affairs continues to hear from you.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to monitor issues of public policy in America, such as the PEPFAR reauthorization bill. If you would like to help us continue our efforts, please click here.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Sexual Purity, Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Legislation,

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com