Passage of Bill to Ban Genetic Discrimination a Victory for All Families

By Doug Carlson - May 6, 2008 - comment

In a major victory for every American, lawmakers bucked partisan politics last week to approve legislation barring employers and health insurance providers from discriminating against individuals and families based on their genetic information.

Congress bridged, at least temporarily, its seemingly widening political divide by overwhelmingly passing the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) by a 95-0 vote in the Senate on April 24, followed by a 414-1 in the House on May 1. Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), whose bid for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination has earned him widespread name recognition, was the lone dissenter.

Increasingly, people are undergoing testing to screen for genetic links to ailments including heart disease, Parkinson’s disease, and certain forms of cancer. Early detection arms doctors with the necessary information to prescribe proper medications to prevent or forestall the onset of such illnesses. These detections can literally saves lives.

Still, the potential that an employer and health insurance provider could make hiring, firing and insurance coverage decisions based on genetic information has prompted many individuals to forego such tests. Some prefer to gamble with their health rather than with their jobs or insurance coverage. An insurance company, for example, could legally raise premiums on a woman who is found to have a gene linked to breast cancer. But GINA should lay these fears to rest.

The legislation also quells a significant pro-life concern of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission that protection against discrimination based on genetic deficiencies might not be extended to the smallest among us. Thanks to the efforts of Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI), the bill includes an amendment prohibiting discrimination against individuals and families whose unborn children or children being adopted are revealed to have genetic predisposition toward certain diseases. Without this provision, parents could be compelled, for instance, to abort their unborn baby diagnosed with Down’s syndrome rather than stand the chance of their insurance company dropping coverage.

ERLC President Richard Land lauded the passage of GINA in a May 2 press release.

“I applaud the Congress, both Senate and House, for passing this extremely important legislation to protect the privacy of the genetic information of each individual human being. No one should be discriminated against in this society based upon his or her genetic makeup or any genetic markers for debilitating illnesses,” he said.

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act should be welcomed by all. Sadly, it took a surprising 13 years to ripen, having been first introduced in 1995. Congress would do well to set aside its differences more often to act on principle for the benefit of every individual and family.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to monitor issues of public policy in America, such as the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. If you would like to help us continue our efforts, please click here.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Living, Health, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com