Pro-life, pro-family causes make gains in election

By Tom Strode - Nov 15, 2004 - comment

Pro-life and pro-family advocates took hope from the national election results.

Not only did the voters return to the White House a President who had supported pro-life legislation and a federal amendment to protect marriage, but they apparently increased the number of social conservatives in Congress.

Seven of the newly elected members of the Senate are pro-life, according to the National Right to Life Committee. They are, the NRLC reported, Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, David Vitter of Louisiana, John Thune of South Dakota, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Mel Martinez of Florida and Johnny Isakson of Georgia. All are Republicans. DeMint, Thune, Burr and Martinez replace pro-choice senators.

Twenty of the 38 new members of the House of Representatives are pro-life, and another three are expected to vote pro-life most of the time, according to the NRLC.

Supporters of the Marriage Protection Amendment expect a net gain of four votes in the Senate. The amendment, which was rejected in both houses this year, would define marriage as a union of only a man and a woman and prevent courts from legalizing same-sex marriage.

The increase of Senate Republicans from 51 to 55 may help on judicial nominees. It now may be possible for President Bush’s allies to change the Senate rules to prohibit filibusters on judicial nominees. If so, Republicans would no longer need 60 votes to end a filibuster but only a majority to confirm a nominee. On several of Bush’s nominees in his first term, there was a majority for confirmation but not 60 votes to invoke cloture.

With the additional GOP margin, Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, predicted if the Democrats’ tactics continue, “Majority Leader [Bill] Frist will try to change the rules to eliminate filibustering of nominees.”

Frist has hinted some form of action would be forthcoming. “I’m very confident that now we’ve gone from 51 seats to 55 seats, we will be able to overturn this, what has become customary, filibuster of judicial nominees,” Frist said Nov. 3, according to the Associated Press.

“Moral values” took the No. 1 spot on Americans’ list of issues that determined their vote for the presidency, according to nationwide exit polling by the National Election Pool. When asked to identify the most important issue in their decision, 22 percent cited “moral values.” Of those, 79 percent chose Bush, 18 percent Kerry and 2 percent Nader. The morality issue surpassed the economy, 20 percent; terrorism, 19 percent, and Iraq, 15 percent.

In addition, 22 percent of voters in the NEP exit poll were identified as white, evangelical/born again Christians. Of those, 77 percent voted for Bush, 22 percent for Kerry and 1 percent for independent Ralph Nader.

“The faith factor was the difference in this election,” Land said. “Even The New York Times acknowledged that the faith factor was determinative.

Not only did more than three-fourths of evangelicals vote for Bush, but “a whole lot more of them voted” than in 2000, Land said.

The ERLC, as well as other evangelical organizations and churches, promoted voter registration and education in an unprecedented manner this year. The ERLC initiated the year-long iVoteValues campaign and was joined by Focus on the Family in a joint effort.

“I want to take a moment to thank all the Southern Baptists and others who supported the iVoteValues campaign and who voted their values, beliefs and convictions and who encouraged others to vote their values, beliefs and convictions,” Land said.

In other evidence of the nationwide support for protecting marriage, voters in 11 states passed amendments protecting marriage as the union of a man and a woman. So far, all 17 states that have voted on such initiatives have approved them, most by overwhelming margins.

The pro-life cause suffered a major defeat in California, however. That state’s voters approved an initiative that legalizes destructive embryonic stem cell research and permits research cloning. The research will be funded with up to $3 billion in state bonds over 10 years.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Christian Citizenship, National

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com