Pro-lifers decry APA’s denial of link between abortion, depression

By Tom Strode - Aug 27, 2008 - comment

Representatives of post-abortion and pregnancy center organizations have denounced a report that asserts there is no trustworthy evidence that a lone abortion causes mental health problems in a woman.

A task force of the American Psychological Association offers that conclusion in a draft report released after what the APA described as a review of studies conducted since 1989.

Women who have experienced and observed the negative impact of abortion found the report difficult to accept, especially after other studies have reported conflicting results.

“It’s a classic case of the abortion lobby’s political and financial interests trumping the truth,” said Janet Morana, a co-founder of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, in a written release. The group describes itself as the world’s largest network of women and men hurt by abortion.

“Over 600 post-abortive women asked to meet with the APA about their experiences with abortion and depression,” she said. “The APA brushed them off, just like it dismissed any scientific study that didn’t agree with its agenda.”

The president of Care Net, which serves about 1,100 pregnancy centers in North America, said the task force “completely disregarded credible research that shows abortion increasing the risk of clinical depression, suicide, drug and alcohol abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder.”

The report “flies in the face of what pregnancy centers see every day”—the grief of post-abortive women and men, including 13,000 just in 2006, who go to Care Net centers asking for help, Care Net’s Melinda Delahoyde said in a written statement. “The APA may continue to politicize abortion, but Care Net and its network of affiliated pregnancy centers are committed to providing medically referenced and accurate information about abortion risks to empower women to make informed health decisions.”

The task force decided many of the studies from the last two decades were flawed methodologically, according to the APA.

“The best scientific evidence published indicates that among adult women who have an unplanned pregnancy, the relative risk of mental health problems is no greater if they have a single elective first-trimester abortion or deliver that pregnancy,” said Brenda Major, chair of the task force, in an Aug. 12 written release. “The evidence regarding the relative mental health risks associated with multiple abortions is more uncertain.”

A woman who feels either pressure to abort or a need to hide an abortion from family and friends is more likely to have psychological problems, according to the task force.

A New Zealand researcher whose 2006 study showed abortion increases the risk of severe depression in young women criticized the task force report.

“The APA report, in fact, does draw a very strong and dogmatic conclusion that cannot be defended on the basis of evidence, since this evidence is lacking by the admission of the report,” David Fergusson said, according to LifeNews.com. “What the committee has, in effect, said is that until there is compelling evidence to the contrary, people should act as though abortion has no harmful effects. This is not a defensible position in a situation in which there is evidence pointing in the direction of harmful effects.”

Fergusson’s 2006 study found about 42 percent of women who underwent abortions had suffered major depression within the last four years, a rate almost twice the number of women who had not been pregnant, LifeNews reported.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com