Pro-lifers: Stronger RU 486 warnings not enough

By Tom Strode - Nov 30, 2004 - comment

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is putting stronger warnings on the abortion drug RU 486, but pro-life advocates say the action is insufficient. So does the father of a teen-ager who died after taking the drug.

The FDA announced Nov. 15 it was expanding the “boxed warning” for Mifeprex, the trade name for mifepristone, also known as RU 486. Mifeprex’s “boxed” label, which constitutes the highest level of warning on a FDA-approved drug, says “[s]erious and sometimes fatal infections and bleeding occur very rarely” after abortions, including those from the use of RU 486.

The federal agency also revealed a third woman had died after using the abortion drug. The most recent fatality was reported to the FDA in August, according to an agency spokesman. A 22-year-old woman, whose name was undisclosed and who was seven weeks pregnant, died of an apparent systemic infection.

Previously, two deaths following the use of the abortion drug had been reported. Last year, Holly Patterson, 18, died of a systemic infection in September after obtaining RU 486 from a Planned Parenthood clinic in Hayward, Calif. In October 2001, a 38-year-old woman, whose identity was undisclosed, died from a ruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Monty Patterson, Holly’s father, called for more from the FDA.

“How many more deaths is it going to take before the FDA takes action to remove this drug from the market?” he told The New York Times, according to LifeNews.com. “I’m not convinced this drug is safe, and I still think it should be banned.”

Wendy Wright, senior policy director of Concerned Women for America, said, “When women’s lives are at stake, this is unacceptable.”

RU 486 causes the lining of the uterus to release the embryonic child. RU 486 normally is used in the first seven weeks of pregnancy. A second drug, a prostaglandin, is taken two days after RU 486 and causes the uterus to contract, expelling the baby.

Congress failed to vote this year on legislation to suspend approval of RU 486 pending a review of the FDA’s process in certifying the abortion drug for use in this country. The RU 486 Suspension and Review Act is expected to be promoted again in the coming session.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com