Q&A: Richard Land

By Collin Hansen - Jul 30, 2007 - 1

Stained Glass Pews

Photo by Rebecca Reid

Collin Hansen: Do evangelicals treat some political issues as black-and-white that should be categorized as gray?

Richard Land: God may not have a position on the precise nature of the tax burden on the American people. But I believe he does have quite a specific position when it comes to his institution, holy matrimony. Now, I think there are some tax policies that work better than others in terms of results. The Bush tax cuts have produced more revenue for the government than Clinton’s tax increases did. So the question has to be asked: Which economic system works? Do you really want to help poor people or just stick it to rich people?

CH: How can evangelicals improve at translating Scriptural principles into law?

RL: When Martin Luther King Jr. was in the Birmingham jail, he wrote that he was in that jail because he refused to obey an unjust law. It’s an unjust law because it doesn’t coincide with the moral law of God. To me that’s making a moral argument.

It’s more important now than it was in Lincoln’s time or King’s time. We live in a culture when more people are disconnected from any adequate understanding of biblical teaching.

CH: You say that we are a nation blessed by God. Doesn’t that lead to a destructive national pride?

RL: A blessing by its definition is unmerited and undeserved. We can’t take any credit for it. It certainly should be no occasion for pride. In fact, it’s an occasion to obligation.

CH: You write that we shouldn’t work for legislation that proclaims America is a Christian nation. Why not?

RL: For one thing, that reading of history is inaccurate. Having said that, we can win the argument I’m making. We can convince a significant majority of the American people to support government accommodation of religion and principled pluralism. You’re not going to convince the American people to give a privileged position to Christianity.

This article originally appeared on the Christianity Today magazine Web site. Copyright © 2007 Christianity Today.

Would you like your own ‘Q&A’ with Richard Land? Join Dr. Land every Saturday (live) on national radio for Richard Land LIVE! on the Salem Radio Network and ask your own questions. (Broadcast airs, live, from 12 noon to 3:00 pm EST. Call toll free 1- 888 -324-8456) Check local listings for a station near you or listen on the web with the streaming options provided on the homepage.

Related elsewhere:

The Divided States of America? is available from ChristianBook.com and other retailers.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Christian Citizenship, Legislation, Religious Liberty

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Sep 8th, 2007, at 6:57pm, Harry Rockefeller wrote:

What Richard’s answers should have been.
How can evangelicals improve at translating Scriptural principles into law?
Read relevant books by authors Rousas J. Rushdooney, and Greg Bahnsen.  Take God and His Word seriously.

You say that we are a nation blessed by God. Doesn’t that lead to a destructive national pride?
Blessing follows obedience.  There is nothing special about the United States except that we honored God’s covenant relationship with nations.

You write that we shouldn’t work for legislation that proclaims America is a Christian nation. Why not?
We would need a U.S. Constitutional amendment to replace Article VI paragraph 3’s no religious oath test with an oath to Divinely inspired Old and New Testaments.  If that happened then we could proclaim America a Christian nation.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com