Rating the Presidents

By Dwayne Hastings - Feb 19, 2007 - 1

It is only appropriate this week—as we mark the birthdays of two of our most beloved presidents—that we ask the question: Who’s number one in U.S. citizens’ hearts?

Abraham Lincoln earns the title of greatest U.S. President, according to a February 2007 Gallup Poll.

Yet support for Lincoln is not overwhelming, with only 18 percent of respondents favoring the Great Emancipator. Ronald Reagan, who has consistently scored in the top three of adored chief executives in Gallup polling, was favored by 16 percent, John Kennedy by 14 percent, Bill Clinton, 13 percent, and Franklin Roosevelt, 9 percent. Not surprisingly, the survey reflects a predilection by Americans toward modern-day presidents.

George Washington was tapped by seven percent of those polled. Following those results were the six percent who had no opinion.

When the political leanings of the respondents are taken into account, the numbers change. Clinton (25%) is top-rated among Democrats; below him in order are Kennedy, Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt. Reagan is tops with Republicans with 32 percent. Lincoln, Kennedy, Washington and George W. Bush follow the Great Communicator.

A September 2005 Wall Street Journal survey of “prominent professors of history, law, political science and economics” suggested that Presidents Washington, Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt were “great” presidents. Reagan joined Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Harry Truman among a group of “near great” presidents.

The scholars’ rankings tagged President George W. Bush (#19 on the list), Clinton (#22) and Jimmy Carter (#34) as “average.”

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Feb 24th, 2007, at 5:13pm, bill darbyshire wrote:

I see a couple of articles discussing the response to Rev. Latham being charged with “offering to engage in an act of lewdness”. One statement talked about the anti-Christians who use incidents like this to show their hate for Christians.

May be some of them out there.

But there’s another side of this story: there are plenty of us who don’t hate Christians, but are repeatedly stunned by the obvious hypocrisy involved whenever we see stories like this: some of the most fervent anti-gay (and gay-hating) people taking part in “gay” activities....

It’s also hypocrisy when we talk of curing or helping the “offenders” to “recover from gayness”, when we know deep, deep in our hearts that homosexuality is not a choice. Who would “choose” to be a homosexual when their very lives would be threatened just by disclosing that fact to the public?

Let’s take care of our own glass house first, before we throw the stones…

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com