Religious leaders urge House to defend DOMA

By Staff
Mar 4, 2011

Following the counsel of President Obama, the Department of Justice announced recently it will no longer defend the traditional definition of marriage as defined under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission decries this decision. In response, ERLC President Richard Land and several other religious leaders sent a letter March 3 to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) urging the House of Representatives “to take leadership in defending DOMA in the federal courts.” The letter is reprinted below and viewable in PDF here (7 KB).

March 3, 2011

The Honorable John Boehner
Speaker of the House
U.S. House of Representatives
H-232, The Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Speaker Boehner:

We write to express our grave concern over the Department of Justice’s decision to no longer defend Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) against legal challenges. We are very troubled by the Obama Administration’s decision to no longer protect the traditional definition of marriage and defend existing law. Because DOMA is so crucial to our society, by protecting its cornerstone institution, we urge the House of Representatives to take leadership in defending DOMA in the federal courts. Specifically, we ask that the House intervene as a party in all cases where DOMA is challenged, not merely to file amicus curiae briefs. Though such action would be unusual, it would be both lawful and warranted under our current legal system and political context.

As you are surely aware, DOMA was passed in 1996 by strong, bipartisan majorities. The law is crucial because it gives states the authority to make their own decisions regarding the recognition of marriages, and defines marriage at the federal level as “a legal union between one man and one woman,” preventing the federal government from recognizing same-sex “marriages.” While the traditional definition of marriage has faced legal and popular challenges of late, a clear majority of Americans oppose same-sex “marriage” and have expressed their support of marriage as the union of one man and one woman in all 31 state referenda and initiatives where the issue has been raised. The definition of marriage is one of the central questions facing our society today. The American people do not want their wishes being overruled by the judiciary—or the executive.

By choosing to no longer defend DOMA in federal court because it believes the law to be unconstitutional, the Obama Administration has undermined the rule of law and the separation of powers. The House has the authority to rectify this lapse in judgment. We implore you to lead the House to take the important, necessary step to protect American law, American families, and American values by defending DOMA and protecting the true meaning of marriage.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Land
President
The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission
Southern Baptist Convention

Leith Anderson
President
National Association of Evangelicals

Dr. Glenn C. Burris, Jr.
President
The International Church of the Foursquare Gospel

Most Rev. Salvatore J. Cordileone
Bishop of Oakland
Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee on the Defense of Marriage
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

The Most Rev. Robert Duncan
Archbishop
Anglican Church in North America

Most Rev. Wilton D. Gregory
Archbishop of Atlanta
Chairman, Committee on Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Dr. Tarunjit Singh (Butalia)
Secretary General
World Sikh Council – America Region (WSC-AR)

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality, Citizenship, , ,

2 Comments (post your own) feed

1 On Mar 5, 2011, at 2:57am, James E Reeves wrote:

It may be that the Jewish Community has been over looked or that they are so much in the minority to make a difference or that they are for Obama’s mandate to encourage the homosexual agenda against the ethical standard of Christian moral values set forth by the founders of this country. Jews are not mention in the above list.
How is it that some Christians are still looking for a Jewish messiah to reign in Israel when Jesus rules a kingdom presently?

2 On Mar 8, 2011, at 2:00am, James E Reeves wrote:

With Muslims control of oil through terror should Christian ethics make any effort to control oil through conscience restraint of it’s membership to not travel. Seems a response is in order. A soft answer turns away wrath and with Baptist listening for leadership Dr. Land can make a plea for seniors to cut back on unnecessary travel to conserve gas. The announcement will lower gas prices.
If not the strain on families will increase the danger of divorce and poverty thus dismantling the “defense of marriage act.”

Post a Comment

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Comments are moderated. Learn how we moderate comments, but here are the highlights:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name.
  2. Comments must be on topic.
  3. Comments are limited to 1000 characters, multiple posts permitted.
  4. Please do not type in ALL CAPS.
  5. We feed name-calling and vulgar language to a really big robot.

By clicking the below Submit button, you express agreement to the Guidelines in their entirety.

You May Also Like

The power of your words

By Daniel Darling - Sep 30, 2013

“Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.” Colossians 4:6

Imagine a resource with endless supply that can be leveraged for unbelievable good or incomprehensible evil and distributed instantly through global networks.…

Read More
Suspect study affirms deadly solution LIFE: God’s love shown through child with Down syndrome