Renowned Scientists Forgo Cloning, Embryo Destruction for New Research

By Doug Carlson - Jan 15, 2008 - 1

The researcher who was the first to isolate embryonic stem cells is abandoning that method. In likewise fashion, the scientist responsible for cloning Dolly the sheep is giving up on his technique. These pioneers in the field of bioengineering are joined by many others who are turning to a new method of stem cell research that holds several advantages over embryo-destructive research, including its avoidance of ethical problems, in the quest to treat diseases.

In quick succession late last year, three separate teams of researchers heralded their breakthrough, demonstrating that embryonic-like stem cells can be produced from human cells without creating or cloning an embryo. Through a process known as direct reprogramming, three or four genes are added to cells derived from humans to produce what are known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or IPS cells, which are functionally equivalent to stem cells taken from human embryos.

Over the past several years, many have lauded research on embryonic stem cells over adult, or non-embryonic, stem cells due to their unique pluripotency, meaning they can develop into all the different cell types in the body.

But research using IPS cells now matches that distinction and holds several advantages over embryonic stem cells and cloning. The greatest advantage is that, unlike research with embryos or cloning, IPS cell research does not require creating or taking innocent human life. Also, IPS cells are readily available in large numbers. Through a simple and relatively painless biopsy on about 1/10 of an inch of skin, researchers can convert 10 or more cell lines to an embryonic-like state, making them genetically identical to the donor. In addition, IPS cells do not require use of women’s eggs, a dangerous requirement for cloning.

While the IPS cells’ embryonic-like qualities make them susceptible to some of the same hurdles as embryonic stem cells, such as tumor formation, IPS cells hold the moral and scientific lines, making embryo-destructive research unnecessary.

Dr. James Thomson, who in 1998 earned world recognition for isolating human embryonic stem cells, and Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, a Japanese professor and researcher, detailed their earthshaking IPS cell research separately in scientific journals last November. One month later, a group from Harvard Medical School and Children’s Hospital unveiled similar successful research.

The breakthrough has prompted Dr. Thomson, along with Dr. Ian Wilmut, the researcher made famous for cloning Dolly the sheep, to abandon their controversial forms of research. Even President Clinton’s bioethics commission, in 1999, indicated that such a discovery should lead researchers to lay aside embryo-destructive research, declaring, “In our judgment, the derivation of stem cells from embryos remaining following infertility treatments is justifiable only if no less morally problematic alternatives are available for advancing the research.”

But even as the world’s premier scientists are abandoning embryo-destructive research efforts, it is almost certain that a sizeable liberal chorus in Congress will continue its refrain that embryonic stem cells hold the promise to cure Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and a host of other ailments.

As part of the House’s first 100 hours last year, under the leadership of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Congress passed legislation to expand federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, although President Bush quickly wielded his veto pen on the measure for the second time in as many years. Undoubtedly, some in Congress are preparing to once again advocate for embryo-destructive stem cell research in 2008.

The IPS cell findings are a welcome addition to the successes of ethical adult, or non-embryonic, stem cell research, which has treated over 70 ailments, and come as a blow to embryo-destructive research, which has yielded no results. Congress should take the queue of some of the world’s foremost scientists and abandon morally irresponsible research on embryos in pursuit of those methods that hold the ethical line.

For further reading on induced pluripotent stem cells:

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: An Amazing Breakthrough in the Scientific Debate.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Cloning, Stem-Cell Research, Science

1 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Jan 15th, 2008, at 9:42pm, Joe DiMarco wrote:

It is my belief that anything that opposes the “Will of God” will not reap any good.  With that said the embryo-destructive research of embryonic stem cells comes to no surprise that this has yielded no results, and the ethical research of Adult Stem Cells have already treated over 70 ailments just goes to show you that God is still in control.

In the end God will win the battle, we already know that.  We just have to be faithful and continue to voice our concerns about these unethical means of research. 

Christian Soldiers keep up the good fight.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com