Resolution would clarify right to pray

By Barbara Shoun - Apr 7, 2008 - comment

JEFFERSON CITY—Missouri voters may soon be asked to vote on a “right-to-pray” amendment to the state’s constitution, but the proposed amendment won’t change anything. Its purpose is to clarify what is already there.

Introduced by Rep. Mike McGhee, R-Odessa, House Joint Resolution 55 (HJR 55) reaffirms the fact that Missourians have the First Amendment right to pray in public buildings.

McGhee said his legislation is like that introduced by Rep. Carl Bearden, R-Jefferson City, two years ago except that Bearden’s bill only mentioned schools while the newer bill makes it clear that anyone can pray on any public property.

McGhee said he has not had the time to verify all the incidents that have been brought to his attention but gave an example of the experience of one woman who works in the Capitol. After this woman’s daughter wrote, “I love you, Jesus” on a school paper, the child’s teacher instructed her to mark off the word “Jesus” and write “Mommy” in its place.

Provisions of the proposed amendment include the following:

  • that individuals cannot be coerced to participate in prayer or other religious activity;
  • that public prayers not be allowed to disturb the peace or disrupt public meetings;
  • that elected officials and state employees shall have the same right to pray on public property as do other citizens;
  • that ministers may be invited to offer invocations at public meetings;
  • that students shall have the right to exercise religious expression;
  • and that public schools be required to display copies of the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution in a conspicuous place.

McGhee, who attends weekly prayer meetings in the Capitol as well as Sunday worship services at First Baptist Church, Odessa, says he discussed the proposed amendment with his pastor and other clergy before introducing it. He feels it is a good piece of legislation and is optimistic about its passage.

Kerry Messer, lobbyist for Missouri Baptist Convention’s Christian Life Commission, said the legislation is needed. “There is systemic public ignorance about interaction with public buildings, especially with students in public schools,” he said.

“Teachers don’t know. Administrators are afraid of lawsuits. School boards don’t want to tackle it. We live in a cultural atmosphere of repression toward students’ rights to express their religious liberty.”

Messer noted that President Bill Clinton, during his time in office, ordered the Secretary of Education to clarify citizens’ religious freedom rights. The secretary sent letters to every school in the nation, outlining students’ rights to express themselves. However, Messer said, “when you go from public school district to public school district, there’s no consistent understanding of the application of the law.”

While the bill does seem to have support in the Legislature, attempts were made to amend a phrase that refers to a citizen’s right to acknowledge Almighty God. One would have inserted the words “the Saints, or the Virgin Mary” after the word “God.” Another would have inserted “or Allah” in that space and another would have inserted the words “Supreme Being.” All were defeated.

Under the Dome, a newsletter published weekly by Messer’s Missouri Family Network organization, explained that the amendments were rejected after Rep. Jim Avery-St. Louis, offered an additional amendment listing the names of almost 8,000 gods to make the point that “Almighty God” is above all.

HJR 55 was approved by the House of Representatives on a 132-11-2 vote. It was sent to the Senate where it was introduced by Sen. Jason Crowell, R-Cape Girardeau, and is currently awaiting action in that legislative body.

This article is reprinted from the March 25, 2008, issue of The Pathway, the newspaper of the Missouri Baptist Convention.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Legislation, Religious Liberty

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com