Retired Military Chaplains: Don’t Touch ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’

By Doug Carlson
May 12, 2010

As Congress soon wages an intense battle over its policy on homosexuals in the military, it faces the impossible task of reconciling the declines in troop morale, unit cohesion, and order in the armed forces that would inevitably result with open homosexuals in the ranks. That is reason enough to maintain the current law’s prohibition against it.

Now a band of retired military chaplains is spotlighting another area that would come under siege if the 1993 law commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is overturned: religious liberty.

In an April 28 letter to President Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, 40 retired military chaplains, hailing from an array of denominations, said they are “deeply concerned” that changing the law “would threaten the religious liberty of chaplains and Service members.”

Their concerns are manifold. Chaplains could, according to the dozens of retired chaplains, “be pressured by adverse discipline and collapsed careers into watering down their teachings and avoiding—if not abandoning—key elements of their sending denomination’s faith and practice.” They “might have their ability to freely share their religious beliefs challenged and torn away in a variety of everyday situations.” And they could be “effectively ban[ned]” from expressing any religious convictions whatsoever that bring into question the homosexual lifestyle.

One example of certain religious liberty infraction is in counseling. Chaplains, the letter notes, would be placed in “an untenable position” in offering guidance to homosexuals: either affirm one’s religious convictions against homosexuality and “run the risk of career-ending accusations of insubordination and discrimination” or compromise those convictions. Silence, the retired chaplains underscore, would not placate Pentagon policy. Chaplains refusing to counsel in such situations “may still face discipline for discrimination.”

An additional concern raised is that current and future chaplains would be required to sign their name in agreement with a “non-discrimination” policy that would put them at odds with their religious beliefs against homosexuality.

That only scratches the surface of religious liberty concerns. “Put most simply,” wrote the retired chaplains, “if the government normalizes homosexual behavior in the armed forces, many (if not most) chaplains will confront a profoundly difficult moral choice: whether they are to obey God or to obey men.” The net effect, as the chaplains caution, would be a loss of religious liberty among all servicemen and women.

The letter came just two days prior to further comment by the Pentagon. In a sharply worded April 30 letter, Secretary Gates told Congress he “strongly opposes” changing the 1993 law prior to a review of the current policy, which is expected to be completed in December. This is a shift in tone from Secretary Gates, who, in February along with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, pledged support for repealing the 1993 law and announced a working group toward that end.

But it is no admission of backing down from repeal. For his part, President Obama remains “unequivocal” in his support for repealing the law, according to a White House statement. “This is not a question of if, but how.”

And many in Congress, facing intense pressure from the gay and lesbian community, hope to overturn “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” sooner rather than later. Prior to Memorial Day, the House and Senate Armed Services Committees are expected to consider such legislation, the Military Readiness Enhancement Act (H.R. 1283/S. 3065), which could be attached to the Defense Authorization bill.

Meanwhile, the 40 retired military chaplains do not stand alone. They join more than 1,100 retired Flag & General Officers for the Military who have spoken out in support of the law against homosexuals serving in the military. What this helps to demonstrate is that many chaplains, servicemen, and officers currently serving in the military feel constrained from speaking out in support of the law. Thankfully other patriots, now retired from duty, feel at liberty to break the silence.

If you agree, please contact your congressman and senators and urge them to oppose efforts to repeal the 1993 law known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

You May Also Like

The best way to confront global hunger

By Tom Elliff - Oct 7, 2013

Lately, more so than in recent years, it seems all too common to be confronted by the plaintive look of a beggar standing at a crowded intersection. Hungry and Homeless … Need Help often reads the tattered cardboard sign held just beneath an unshaven neck.…

Read More

LIFE DIGEST: British put babies on death pathway

By Tom Strode - Dec 4, 2012

The British end-of-life protocol known as the Liverpool Care Pathway is being used for the deaths of sick children and disabled newborns.

Health-care providers supposedly were using the Pathway only for terminally ill adults and the elderly, but a new article in the British Medical Journal showed they also are withholding food, water and medicine from children, the Daily Mail reported Nov.…

Read More

VIDEO: Millennials, moral relativism and the “Me” generation

By Thomas Willis - Jan 24, 2014

Do Millennials embrace moral relativism and focus on their own desires, more than any previous generation?

Matthew Arbo, assistant professor of Christian ethics at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, talks to Thomas Willis, Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, about the Christian witness to the Millennial generation and shaping their view of ethics.…

Read More
A moral and just response to the immigration crisis OVERVIEW: Immigration