SBC’s Richard Land commends presidential veto of “biotech cannibalism”

By staff - Jul 19, 2006 - 3

WASHINGTON, July 19, 2006—Following Senate approval of three critical stem cell research bills and the subsequent presidential veto of H.R. 810 by President Bush today, Dr. Richard Land, president of The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, commented on the vote and presidential action.

“All Americans should rejoice that not one senator or representative voted against the ban on fetus farming (S. 3504). That’s an overwhelming statement of the moral reprehension with which the Congress looks upon the idea of creating embryos for the express purpose of killing them to harvest their fetal tissue. That’s the good news.

“The bad news is that while the Senate voted 100-0 in favor of the pluripotent stem cell research bill (S. 2754), enough representatives, Republican and Democrat, decided to play politics with this issue that the bill failed by 12 votes to reach the two-thirds majority in the House required by the rules under which the vote was taken. This is tragic, because this research could lead in the very near future to being able to develop embryonic-like stem cells without having to kill an embryo in order to harvest such cells.

“The worst news is that the Senate voted 63-37 in favor of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research that does require killing a human embryo in order to extract cells for research (H.R. 810). Since the House has already passed such legislation, it went to President Bush for his veto. Fortunately, the President, standing by the principles he has articulated on this issue from the beginning, has vetoed such legislation so no federal tax money is being used to kill embryos.

“Since neither the Senate nor House has passed the destructive stem cell bill (H.R. 810) by two-thirds, it will not become law. The essential issue here is whether or not we as a nation want to underwrite the killing of unborn children in order to try to seek cures for older and bigger human beings. This is biotech cannibalism, in which we eat our own young in order to treat and extend the lives of older and bigger human beings. Americans should be grateful we have a President who says, ‘No, this is not the kind of nation we want to be.’”

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Stem-Cell Research

3 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Jul 19th, 2006, at 2:26pm, Danny Stringer wrote:

I commend the President for his veto of H.R. 810.
Should we not protect innocent, defenseless human life?

2 On Jul 21st, 2006, at 10:31am, Pat MacKay wrote:

Once again, President Bush has had the backbone to do what is right.

Thank you, Mr. President, for your veto of H.R. 810 in accordance with what most Americans believe to be the right thing to do.

3 On Jul 22nd, 2006, at 1:04pm, wayne allen wrote:

Thank you Mr President for your veto of HR 810.

Once again we thank you for having the backbone
for standing up for yours and our believes.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com