SCHIP veto override fails again in House

By Tom Strode - Jan 24, 2008 - comment

Congress again has fallen short in an effort to override a presidential veto of the expansion of a children’s health insurance program.

On Jan. 23, the House of Representatives voted 260-152 in an attempt to override President Bush’s veto but fell 15 votes short of the two-thirds majority required to succeed. Proponents of the expansion actually lost votes. In October, the House was 13 votes short in its attempt to override Bush’s first veto.

Congress and the president are in conflict largely on the difference in increased spending for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The Bush-vetoed bill would have expanded SCHIP by $35 billion over five years; the president proposed a $5 billion expansion.

SCHIP provides federal funds to states to cover children in low-income families that are not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid but unable to afford private insurance. SCHIP, which went into effect in 1997, has provided $40 billion over the last 10 years.

The president signed legislation in late 2007 to maintain SCHIP at its current enrollment through March 2009.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said after the latest override vote the president was pleased the House sustained his veto of “misguided legislation that would have expanded SCHIP to higher income households while increasing taxes.” She also said in a written statement, “Ultimately our goal should be to move children who have no health insurance to private coverage—not to move children who already have private insurance to government coverage.”

Rep. Diana DeGette, D.-Colo., criticized Republicans, saying, “Our economic outlook has deteriorated since President Bush vetoed this bipartisan, compromise bill for the second time last year. By sustaining his veto, Congressional Republicans continue to stand between millions of children and the health care they need.”

The Democrats are seeking to add four million children to the more than six million now covered by SCHIP.

The SCHIP expansion vetoed by the president would have been underwritten by a 61-cent increase in the federal tobacco tax.

Bush’s latest veto occurred Dec. 12. He rejected such legislation the first time Oct. 3. The White House had promised after the second version’s passage that the president would send it back because the legislation still had “major flaws.”

After the first veto, Congress did not reduce the $35 billion expansion but revised it in an attempt to gain more votes by barring illegal immigrants from the program, capping the ceiling on recipients at 300 percent of the poverty level and moving adults out of the program in half as much time.

The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission has commended the original SCHIP, but it has opposed the two most recent proposals, expressing concern both would mark a significant step toward government-run health care.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Children, Citizenship, Legislation, National, Social Issues

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com