Second judge strikes down partial-birth abortion ban

By Tom Strode - Aug 31, 2004 - comment

A judge in New York City has deflated hopes a congressional ban on partial birth abortion might gain approval in the federal judiciary.

Richard Casey, a federal judge in Manhattan, declared Aug. 26 the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act is unconstitutional. Supporters of the law had expressed cautious optimism Casey, unlike other federal judges, might uphold the prohibition, which bars a procedure on a nearly totally delivered unborn child. During a trial that concluded in June, Casey frequently questioned abortion doctors concerning their procedures and potential pain to the unborn child. He also issued some pretrial rulings sought by the Department of Justice in defending the law.

Advocates of the ban never held out much hope in challenges to the law that occurred also this year in federal courts in San Francisco and Lincoln, Neb. In the San Francisco trial, Phyllis Hamilton struck down the ban in June. Richard Kopf is expected to do the same in Lincoln. Kopf invalidated Nebraska’s partial birth abortion ban in 1997, a decision that was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

ERLC President Richard Land criticized the Supreme Court, rather than Casey, saying he was “disappointed but not surprised.”

“The problem—with a capital P—is the majority of the Supreme Court,” Land said. “We are not going to be able to eliminate this heinous, barbaric procedure called partial birth abortion—which is the killing of a partially born, viable, outside-the-womb baby—until we change the makeup of the current Supreme Court. As Justice [Antonin] Scalia has noted succinctly, this court has taken sides in the culture war, and it’s not the side of life.”

Casey seemed to indicate in his ruling the high court left him with no option, based on its decisions in the 1973 Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton opinions legalizing abortion for essentially any reason throughout pregnancy and its 2000 support for invalidating the Nebraska partial birth abortion ban.

Casey said, however, he found testimony “establishes that [partial birth abortion] is a gruesome, brutal, barbaric and uncivilized medical procedure.” He also said “credible evidence” exists that “[such] abortions subject fetuses to severe pain.”

Casey’s ruling strikes down a law President Bush signed in November. It prohibits a procedure that normally occurs in the fifth or sixth month of pregnancy. The abortion doctor delivers an intact baby feet first until only the head is left in the birth canal. The doctor pierces the base of the infant’s skull with surgical scissors, then inserts a catheter into the opening and suctions out the brain.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com