Senate blocks filibuster, confirms Southwick

By Tom Strode - Oct 24, 2007 - comment

The Senate confirmed Oct. 24 another nominee to a federal appeals court after a contentious battle.

The Republicans stayed unified and gained enough Democrats to bring up for a vote the nomination of Leslie Southwick to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The 62-35 vote to invoke cloture, which ends debate and prevents a filibuster, surpassed the three-fifths majority needed. The Senate followed with a 59-38 vote for Southwick’s confirmation, which required only a simple majority.

Southwick is the latest in a series of nominees by President Bush to federal appeals courts whose confirmations have been blocked or delayed by Democrats either in the Judiciary Committee or in the full Senate.

After the votes, Bush thanked the Senate, calling Southwick a “man of character and intelligence who will apply the law fairly.” The president, however, said he had nominated other “highly qualified men and women” and urged senators to give them “fair up or down votes.”

The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, as well as other organizations that support the confirmation of judges committed to interpreting the Constitution based on its original intent, commended the votes on Southwick.

“I’m encouraged to see that the Senate is still capable of doing the right thing,” said Barrett Duke, the ERLC’s vice president for public policy. “I am confident Judge Southwick will make a significant contribution to the Fifth Circuit.”

Until early August, it appeared Southwick’s nomination, which was announced in January, may not escape the Judiciary Committee. Then, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, joined the nine Republicans on the committee to forward the nomination to the full Senate in a 10-9 vote.

Democrats and liberal organizations said they were opposed to Southwick’s confirmation based on his agreement with two written opinions as a member of the Mississippi Court of Appeals, according to The Hill, a Washington newspaper.

One opinion Southwick signed onto awarded custody of an 8-year-old girl to her father instead of her bisexual mother. In the same case, he joined in a concurring opinion that used the word “homosexuals” instead of “gays,” a word choice that brought condemnation from his critics. The other decision targeted by opponents was the court’s affirmation of the reinstatement of a white state worker who had used a racial epithet, The Hill reported.

Feinstein said she would not vote for Southwick if she believed he were racist.

Twelve Democrats and an independent, Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, joined the 49 GOP members to invoke cloture on Southwick’s nomination.

The Fifth Circuit, which is based in New Orleans, consists of the states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

Southwick, 57, is an adjunct professor at the Mississippi College School of Law. He took a leave of absence from the Mississippi Court of Appeals to serve on active duty with the Mississippi National Guard in Iraq from August 2004 to January 2006. During that time, he served as a judge advocate.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality, Citizenship, National, Racial Reconciliation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com