Senate OKs Funding Overseas Abortion Advocates

By Doug Carlson - Sep 11, 2007 - comment

In the Senate’s first week in Washington after a month-long recess, a majority of the body sent a grim reminder to the American people of their intent to weaken pro-life policies, while President Bush issued a strikingly different reminder that he intends to guard existing pro-life policies.

The Senate rejected Sept. 6 a measure to reaffirm a long-standing pro-life policy that prohibits federal funds from supporting organizations that perform or promote abortions in foreign countries. Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) admirably led the pro-life effort by offering an amendment to the State-Foreign Operations Appropriations bill (H.R. 2764) to protect the Mexico City Policy, which mandates that organizations may receive aid through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) only if they agree not to perform abortions, to lobby foreign governments to revise their abortion laws, or to promote abortion as a method of family planning.

The amendment failed 41-53, with seven Republicans joining 44 Democrats and two independents in opposition.

Just prior to the vote on Sen. Brownback’s amendment, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) offered an amendment of her own to effectively repeal the Mexico City Policy. The Senate approved it by the inverse margin, 53-41.

President Reagan first instituted the Mexico City Policy in 1984. It was rescinded years later under President Clinton before President George W. Bush reinstated the policy upon taking office in 2001.

All was not lost, however, during that day’s battle to protect the sanctity of human life. The Senate chose to protect what is known as the Kemp-Kasten law, which prohibits federally-funding an organization that “supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.” Without the Kemp-Kasten provision, the U.S. could find itself in the position of funding the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which is linked to China’s program of forced abortion under its one-child policy. The measure to preserve Kemp-Kasten, also attached to H.R. 2764 by Sen. Brownback, narrowly passed 48-45.

The overall bill, which includes both a defeat and a victory for the sanctity of human life, passed 81-12.

In June, the House rejected an amendment to protect the Mexico City Policy within the foreign spending bill by a narrow margin of 205-218. The House ultimately approved the full bill, which includes the Kemp-Kasten provision, 241-178.

The House and Senate now must iron out the differences between their bills before sending a final version to the president.

The Bush Administration, to its credit, reminded Congress Sept. 6 by formal statement that the president would veto H.R. 2764 because, in addition to falling short of his funding request, it eliminates the Mexico City Policy. President Bush has reaffirmed his strong pro-life stance in recent months, most notably in a letter sent in May to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stating that he would not hesitate to use his veto pen on any bill that weakens current pro-life policy.

All individuals who believe federal taxpayer dollars should not be sent to organizations that perform or promote abortions should tell their senators and congressmen to oppose the State-Foreign Operations Appropriations bill (H.R. 2764) if it does not protect the Mexico City Policy. Also, President Bush should be thanked for his commitment to protect human life. You can contact them here.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Legislation, Science, Bioethics

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com