Senate OKs large increase in fines for broadcast indecency

By Tom Strode - May 15, 2006 - comment

The Senate has joined the House of Representatives in supporting hefty increases in fines for indecency on radio and television.

The Senate approved May 18 the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, which would require a ten-fold increase in fines for broadcast indecency. The bill, which passed the Senate by unanimous consent, would increase the maximum federal fine for each broadcast violation from $32,500 to $325,000. Differences between the Senate-approved bill and an even more stringent measure passed last year by the House will have to be worked out before Congress can provide final passage.

In February 2005, the House passed its version in a 389-38 vote. The House measure would: (1) Increase the maximum fine per violation by the Federal Communications Commission to $500,000; (2) raise the top penalty for an intentional violation by a performer or network from $11,000 to $500,000; (3) mandate a license revocation hearing for a station after a third violation, and (4) require the FCC to act on indecency complaints within 180 days.

The Senate bill, S. 193, appeared to be mired in a committee before Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee used a parliamentary maneuver to gain its passage. The procedure enabled Frist to bring it directly to the floor without committee approval. Although any senator could have blocked passage by objecting, none did.

In 2004, both houses overwhelmingly approved bills increasing indecency fines, but differences could not be worked out, causing the measures to die when Congress adjourned.

Supporters of the legislation believe increasing the fines will work to reduce television and radio programming considered indecent by FCC guidelines.

Neither bill would directly affect cable or satellite programming. The FCC has the authority to regulate only broadcast radio and television. On TV, that includes such networks as ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Pop Culture, Sexual Purity, Pornography

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com