Senate votes 99-1 to increase indecency fines

By Tom Strode - Jun 15, 2004 - comment

The Senate voted nearly unanimously June 22 to increase fines dramatically for broadcast indecency.

The Senate voted 99-1 in favor of a proposal to increase ten-fold the maximum penalty the Federal Communications Commission may issue for a decency violation on television and radio. The measure would increase the maximum fine from $27,500 to $275,000 when the FCC determines a broadcaster is guilty of “obscene, indecent or profane language.” The legislation also would set a limit of $3 million for a single violation that continues or produces multiple complaints.

Sen. Sam Brownback, R.-Kan., proposed the Senate measure, known as the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, as an amendment to the Department of Defense authorization bill, S. 2400. Brownback requested a roll-call vote on the amendment, S.A. 3464, and only Sen. John Breaux, D.-La., voted against it.

“I applaud Senator Brownback for holding the senators’ feet to the fire and obligating them to stand up and be counted in a roll-call vote on this issue,” ERLC President Richard Land said. “There’s no question where the vast majority of Americans are on this issue, and I’m glad to see the senators for once accurately representing their constituencies. It’s interesting—the one senator who did not vote for it is not seeking re-election. It’s a wonderful thing to see how election cycles focus politicians’ attention.”

In March, the House of Representatives voted 391-22 for a stand-alone bill, also titled the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, H.R. 3717. That measure differs from the Senate version. The House proposal would increase the maximum FCC fine to $500,000. The measure also would call for FCC license revocation proceedings after three violations by a radio or television station.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Pop Culture, Sexual Purity

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com