Supreme Court rejects personhood appeal

By Staff
Nov 2, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to consider a request to allow Oklahomans the opportunity to vote on a personhood amendment protecting unborn children.

The justices issued an order Oct. 29 rejecting an appeal by the initiative’s supporters, thereby permitting a decision by the Oklahoma Supreme Court to stand. The state high court ruled in April the initiative violated a 20-year-old decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Oklahoma high court invalidated the initiative even though Personhood Oklahoma, the organization behind the effort, was still seeking at the time to gain the signatures needed to place the proposal on the November ballot. In its order, the state’s justices ruled the initiative contravened the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which permitted some state restrictions on abortion but reaffirmed a woman’s right to the procedure.

The rejected proposal would have amended the Oklahoma constitution to define a person as “any human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being to natural death.” It also would have protected due process and equal protection rights regardless of “age, place of residence or medical condition.”

The Oklahoma effort is part of a nationwide movement seeking to gain legal protection for unborn babies.

Personhood Oklahoma responded to the high court order by announcing it would renew its petition effort the next day, Oct. 30. “In Oklahoma, the people were denied their right to petition and their right to vote. … [T]he people of Oklahoma will not rest until our voices are heard, and our women and children are protected from abortion,” said Dan Skerbitz, leader of Personhood Oklahoma, in a written statement.

Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver, who represented Personhood Oklahoma, said in a written release, “The issue is not about the merits of personhood but about whether a state court can interfere with the rights of citizens to gather signatures to amend their constitutions. On the issue, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision is wrong.”

The head of one of the abortion rights organizations that opposed the personhood initiative said the Oct. 29 order was “another resounding message … that such extremist assaults on our fundamental rights will not stand.” Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a written statement that personhood initiatives are “a bald-faced attempt to foreclose women’s access to a full range of reproductive health care.”

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, Citizenship, ,

You May Also Like

Prayer, fasting and the persecuted Church

By Naghmeh Abedini - Mar 4, 2015

Over the last few years we have heard so much disturbing news regarding Christian persecution. Unfortunately my husband, Saeed Abedini, continues to be part of that news as he suffers for the third consecutive year in the notorious Iranian prison because of his Christian faith.…

Read More

Church Equip events aid in tackling ethical questions

By Tom Strode - Aug 9, 2013

For one church, it might be homosexuality. For another, it might be adoption. For another, it might be abortion or race relations or pornography or human trafficking.

Whatever issue a Southern Baptist church needs to address, the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission is seeking to tailor congregation-by-congregation methods of helping them by means of a new initiative called Church Equip.…

Read More

Planned Parenthood rescued by Texas court

By Tom Strode - Oct 30, 2012

Planned Parenthood has gained another reprieve in its ongoing battle against Texas to retain millions of dollars in government funding.

A judge in Austin, Texas, ordered the state Oct. 26 to put a stop for the time being to enforcement of a law that prohibits Planned Parenthood from participating in a women’s health program.…

Read More
Friday, November 2 Weekend - November 3-4, 2012