Supreme Court rejects personhood appeal

By Staff
Nov 2, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to consider a request to allow Oklahomans the opportunity to vote on a personhood amendment protecting unborn children.

The justices issued an order Oct. 29 rejecting an appeal by the initiative’s supporters, thereby permitting a decision by the Oklahoma Supreme Court to stand. The state high court ruled in April the initiative violated a 20-year-old decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Oklahoma high court invalidated the initiative even though Personhood Oklahoma, the organization behind the effort, was still seeking at the time to gain the signatures needed to place the proposal on the November ballot. In its order, the state’s justices ruled the initiative contravened the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which permitted some state restrictions on abortion but reaffirmed a woman’s right to the procedure.

The rejected proposal would have amended the Oklahoma constitution to define a person as “any human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being to natural death.” It also would have protected due process and equal protection rights regardless of “age, place of residence or medical condition.”

The Oklahoma effort is part of a nationwide movement seeking to gain legal protection for unborn babies.

Personhood Oklahoma responded to the high court order by announcing it would renew its petition effort the next day, Oct. 30. “In Oklahoma, the people were denied their right to petition and their right to vote. … [T]he people of Oklahoma will not rest until our voices are heard, and our women and children are protected from abortion,” said Dan Skerbitz, leader of Personhood Oklahoma, in a written statement.

Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver, who represented Personhood Oklahoma, said in a written release, “The issue is not about the merits of personhood but about whether a state court can interfere with the rights of citizens to gather signatures to amend their constitutions. On the issue, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision is wrong.”

The head of one of the abortion rights organizations that opposed the personhood initiative said the Oct. 29 order was “another resounding message … that such extremist assaults on our fundamental rights will not stand.” Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a written statement that personhood initiatives are “a bald-faced attempt to foreclose women’s access to a full range of reproductive health care.”

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Abortion, Citizenship, ,

You May Also Like

Judge issues split ruling on Miss. abortion law

By Staff - Jul 16, 2012

Mississippi’s only abortion clinic will stay open even though a new law that threatens its existence has gone into effect.

In a ruling Friday (July 13), federal judge Daniel Jordan III of Jackson permitted the law to become effective.…

Read More

Letter to Congress on Health Care Conscience Rights Act of 2013

By Staff - Jun 21, 2013

Russell D. Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, along with Archbishop William Lori, chair of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, sent a letter June 21 to all members of the House and Senate urging defense of religious freedom by passing the Health Care Conscience Rights Act of 2013 (H.R.…

Read More
Friday, November 2 Weekend - November 3-4, 2012