Task force delves into coercion

By Barbara Shoun - Jan 7, 2008 - comment

JEFFERSON CITY – Coercion comes in many forms. That is what members of the Governor’s Task Force on the Impact of Abortion on Women learned when the group met for a study session Dec. 3 at the Missouri Capitol Building.

The two most prevalent items of discussion involved coercion and racial discrimination as experienced by women who are considering or have had abortions.

Kerry Messer, president of Missouri Family Network and lobbyist for Missouri Baptist Convention’s Christian Life Commission, chaired the meeting in the absence of chairperson Cindy Province, co-founder and associate director for The Center for Bioethics and Culture Missouri.

Connie Eller, coordinator/director of Missouri Blacks for Life, is on the commission’s sub-group investigating coercion. She discussed coercion from the standpoint of her own abortion and her 20 years of experience working with the homeless and 10 years working with homeless pregnant women.

Eller noted that, while coercion might come from family and friends, it also comes because of circumstances – loss of a job, loss of a house, drugs, and other factors.

Committee member State Rep. Belinda Harris (D-Hillsboro), who chairs the House Democrats for Life caucus, noted that some women feel coerced to have an abortion when trying to separate from an abusive husband.

She explained that no law says a woman can’t get a divorce while pregnant, but the decision is up to individual judges. In many cases, judges will not grant a divorce until after the baby is born or aborted.

She will be proposing legislation in the next session to require that a court not use a woman’s pregnancy as a reason for delaying a decree of dissolution.

Joe Dalton, director of Pregnancy Resource Center of Rolla, stated that he knew of six pregnant women currently in that situation, awaiting divorces from abusive husbands.

Harris also spoke of women who have told her of decisions they had made to abort when they were young and who now have regrets. She stressed the need to help a woman know that having the baby is an option.

Dalton cited coercion studies by David Reardon, founder of the Elliott Institute of Illinois, which indicate that 64 percent of abortions involve some type of coercion.

Messer noted that the task force has compiled a lot of anecdotal evidence but needs to come up with statistical evidence in order to make informed recommendations to the governor.

Commission members moved on to the topic of racial discrimination. Eller also serves on the sub-committee looking into discrimination in abortion. She said that death by abortion skyrockets beyond other causes of death in the African-American community including heart disease, cancer, accidents, AIDS, and violent crime.

Some black leaders, she said, refer to the abortion of black babies as black genocide. Statistics were cited to the effect that 35 percent of all abortions involve black women, a figure far exceeding the percentage of African-Americans in the United States population.

Among the other topics discussed at the study session were:

  • The availability of counseling for those who have had abortions. Eller, who served on the counseling sub-group, indicated her group had learned of many organizations and programs that provide counseling for post-abortive stress. She presented a 23-page list of post-abortive counseling services with many more to be added to the listing. She indicated there is a need for public education on the symptoms of post-abortive stress.
  • The need for more accurate abortion reporting requirements. Dalton said that the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute shows much higher abortion numbers than the figures from the Missouri Department of Health.
  • The need for more information on the apparent relationship between prior abortions and later premature births with their attendant health problems and escalated cost, as reported in the Journal of Reproductive Medicine.
  • The need for pregnant women to get a second opinion and be provided with adequate information when genetic testing indicates that a child may be born with special needs. The task force wants to make sure that genetic testing isn’t compulsory and that women have the benefit of knowing all their options when they are told they are carrying a special needs child.

After the task force concluded its agenda, Messer opened the floor to comments and questions from the audience, most of whom were pro-choice advocates. Several complained that the issue of pregnancy prevention was not addressed, that the group was made up of only pro-life advocates, and that prior meetings had not been publicized.

Messer explained that the task force could not go beyond the scope of its mission of assessing the impact of abortion on women, that the committee members serve without pay or reimbursement at the pleasure of a pro-life governor, and that most people did not know where to look for the meeting notices, which are posted on the Office of Administration (OA) web site.

No date was set for the next meeting, but Messer indicated it will be posted on the OA web site.

Two hours before the meeting, Planned Parenthood called for Gov. Matt Blunt to disband the commission.

Others on the commission are: Victoria Childs, Open Arms Pregnancy Resource Center director; Mary Chrismer, Vitae Caring Foundation; Susan Klein, lobbyist for Missouri Right to Life; Dr. Carolyn Martin, OB/GYN, board member, Greater St. Louis Crisis Pregnancy Center; John McCastle, CEO and president of Alliance for Life Missouri; Julia Myers, Pregnancy Help Center director; Barbara Quigley, co-founder and executive director of the St. Louis Center for Bioethics and Culture; Sen. Delbert L. Scott (R-Lowry City); and Nancy Valko, president, Missouri Nurses for Life, and board member, Missouri Right to Life.

This article is reprinted from the December 25, 2007, issue of The Pathway, the newsjournal of the Missouri Baptist Convention.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Parenting, Mothers, Life, Abortion, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com